CompuServe Thread

#Preferences Date

5 messages in this thread
#51759From: Claude J. GoschJan 31, 1987 4:22 PM
Has anyone else had this problem: I have an A-TIME clock which I read on boot-up with read-rtc in my startup-sequence. During startup, I print the date with the date command and it prints today's date (31-Jan-87) and the current time. If I bring up a CLI and give the date command I get the correct date & time, however, if I bring up preferences, it shows today's date as 03-Feb-87! Also, if I change the preferences date and save the settings, when I call up preferences again I still get 03-Feb-87!!! If I save the corrected preferences settings and reboot, CLI has the correct date (as before) and preferences still says 03-Feb-87. Also my Aterm Clock gives the correct time, but shows the date as ??? 31, 1987. Does anyone know what's wrong and how to correct it? Claude 75305,771
#51787From: John DraperJan 31, 1987 8:55 PM
Claude, I don't know why your Preferences screen shows the wrong date, but the problem with AtermClock was noticed on Jan 1. I uploaded a corrected version of the clock to DL 4 on the same day. If you decide to download AtermClock, you might want to download Aterm 7.3, which is also in DL 4. It has a phone list for dialing. Regards, Larry.
#51929From: Claude J. GoschFeb 1, 1987 11:52 AM
Thanks, Larry. Preferences is correct today – I don't understand what happened, but it's back to normal. I'll download both Aterm 7.3 and the clock. This Aterm is the best of the terminal programs I have. I'm glad to see that it's actively used and updated. I have Amiga Term from Commodore also, and that one really could use updating. It amazes me to see a PD program like Aterm kept up to date while a commercial program like Amiga Term is not. Thanks for a fine program! Claude
#51945From: John DraperFeb 1, 1987 1:16 PM
Claude, To be fair, commercial programs simply cannot be updated as often as freely distributable ones. The software houses face a completely different set of conditions. They must be concerned with distribution of updates, which cost money. Even if they charge for updates, it still requires a substantial cash investment up front. A freely distributable program, on the other hand has no cash involvement beyond the cost of uploading. In addition, a company must decide when to upgrade, balancing new features against the demand for them. If a company updates too soon, with only minor improvements, the buyers will not take kindly to it, feeling that they need to buy the update or be left behind, and feeling that the company has just found a new way to charge high prices for their software. I'm glad you are enjoying Aterm. Regards, Larry.
#52018From: Marlene ZenkerFeb 1, 1987 7:27 PM
Claude, keep in mind that it's alot easier to fix and re-upload a public domain pgm then to fix, repackage, redistribute etc. a commercial program. However I must say that the PD stuff for the Amiga is exceptional. Marlene