CompuServe Thread

#Personal Acct. Prg.

8 messages in this thread
#9052From: Jeff HalapinDec 12, 1990 6:36 PM
Can anyone reccomend a good personal accounting program? I'm looking for something to keep my home budget on. Thanks!! Jeff Halapin 😉 75265,232
#9054From: Bob RakoskyDec 12, 1990 6:43 PM
Jeff, I've been using Phasar (published by Antic Software) for about 3 years. I've found it to be quite reliable. (Of course, I _never_ stay within budget, but I can't blame that one on the software <grin>). Hope this helps… …BobR
#9339From: Jeff HalapinDec 14, 1990 12:18 AM
Did you buy the upgrade (PHASAR 4.) when it became available? Jeff Halapin 😉 75265,232
#9399From: Bob RakoskyDec 14, 1990 9:56 AM
Jeff, Yes, I bought the Phasar 4.0 upgrade. I felt it was kind of expensive, but think that the improvements made to the program are worth it. Much nicer interface (it's much more "Amiga-like" now), and a bit more flexible. …BobR
#9350From: Wayne ColeDec 14, 1990 1:46 AM
Jeff, I tried Phasar 3.0 (free veresion in A+ mag) and actually got the manual for it but it was too restrictive and, for my taste, counter intuitive. Basically, it looked a lot like a MessyDos program ported over. DeskTop budget is very Amiga-ized and real easy to use. Early versions had problems with balancing accounts fed by split auto payments. Its availabel reports were slim. I keep hoping GD will fix the balancing problem and add a decent report writer feature. However, even as it is, it is adequate to see where the dough goes… wmc
#9400From: Bob RakoskyDec 14, 1990 10:12 AM
Wayne, While Phasar 3.0 did not have a very Amiga-tized interface, it was a well thought-out interface and quite easy to use once one "adapted". The 4.0 version is much more Amiga-tized and very nice, interface-wise. …BobR
#9528From: Wayne ColeDec 15, 1990 2:55 AM
Bob, I kept running out of space for account numbers and names. Did Phasar 4.0 allow more flexibilityin this area? wmc
#9566From: Bob RakoskyDec 15, 1990 12:24 PM
Wayne, Much greater flexibility. If I recall correctly, you still have to configure it for a finite number, but can "reconfigure" it later to expand, if needed. Limits are based on available memory. Reconfiguration is a "slight" pain, as it needs to "correct" all of the transactions recorded, and consequently takes a little while and exposes the database slightly. Of course, a prudent backup prior to the re-org solves this problem. Just probably not something you'd want to do every day. Hope this helps… ..BobR