CompuServe Thread

Bridgeboard HD Access

17 messages in this thread
#10478From: Mike BerroDec 22, 1990 11:15 AM
I used MAKEAB to create a bootable hard disk for my XT bridgeboard. The HD access on the MSDOS side is extremely slow. Is there any way to speed it up? I have an A2000, A2088, A2091, A2052. Thanx! —Mike
#10498From: Marion J DelandDec 22, 1990 7:52 PM
Mike … Not really. That's the bad news about MAKEAB. It seems to be about half the speed of the drive on the Amiga side. Marion Deland CROSSINGS (Bridgeboard newsletter)
#10598From: Mike BerroDec 23, 1990 11:26 PM
Ah well. Thanx for the info. —Mike
#10514From: Don Curtis/SYSOPDec 22, 1990 11:37 PM
The slowdown is the movement of data thru the dual ported RAM on the BB, and thus…I'm afraid you'll have to live with it. The best you can expect is about 70Kbytes/sec. Don
#10520From: Mike SchillerDec 23, 1990 12:59 AM
Don: I've been thinking about something for a while, and so let me see what you think of it. What would happen if I take my GVP SCSI host adapter, reset it's ID from 7 to 6, then hookup an XT SCSI adapter as ID 7 and then format a partition on one of my drives using the XT adapter's ROM routines, fdisk, etc, and then mount that partition on the Amiga side using CrossDOS? Is it possible for 2 SCSI host adapters to co-exist on the same bus? What are the possible problems I would have with this setup? Can pluging in the second host adapter onto the SCSI buss blowup (fry) any of the stuff on the buss? (HD's, or GVP card)? -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#10530From: Don Curtis/SYSOPDec 23, 1990 2:37 AM
Mike, Under the current SCSI design used by all (that I know of) Amiga host adapters, there can only be 1 host. Under differential SCSI, there can be more than one host, but I know of no one making a differential host adapter for the Amiga. But, what you can do, is set up an XT host adapter on the Bridge side and attach and partition one of your drives for MS-DOS on that drive, and partition the rest of the drive using ADISK as an Amiga drive (via DJMount). Yes, that partition will be slow, but if you plan carefully, I think you'll find that you can do 99% of your work on the native Amiga drive and hardly use that DJMounted drive much at all. The MS-DOS partition on that drive however, will be 'full speed' since it's directly connected to the XT bus. I've got 100 Meg on the Amiga side of my setup, (over 3 HD's) and I hardly ever use 20 of that. I've also got a 4th HD on the MS-DOS side (20 Meg) so I don't need to make a separate parition for either side to share…but if I had to…I could easily have moved that 20 Meg from the Amiga side to the MS-DOS side and hardly miss it at all. Don
#10531From: Mike SchillerDec 23, 1990 3:00 AM
Don: I've gone that route before (having a separate drive for the BB) and my reasons for the dual host question were more to have the ability to use CrossDOS to access the partition as well as the BB. -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#10565From: Don Curtis/SYSOPDec 23, 1990 5:20 PM
Mike, Ok…then I guess the answer to your question is no, as far as I know. Don
#10621From: BILL LEACHDec 24, 1990 8:08 AM
Mike; I don't know about the GVP (probably should talk to them) but the (now defunct) C-Ltd Kronos SCSI controller would do just exactly what you wanted. I suspect that if you can reset the GVP's controller address to something other than 7, it will probably work too. Of course that is only half of the problem as the BB SCSI controller has to be willing to give up the bus too. I would imagine that it makes more sense to leave the GVP as the master and have the BB controller ask for the bus when it wants it. 73, bill
#10599From: Mike BerroDec 23, 1990 11:27 PM
Oh well. Thanx for the info. —Mike
#10522From: Kevin UshkoDec 23, 1990 1:09 AM
The dual ported RAM really slows things down both ways. I have a PC/XT controller with my Bridgeboard, and the fastest access I can get on the Amiga side (using Diskspeed 3.1) is 22K/s. While my new GVP/Quantum pair can get up to over 600K. Kevin Ushko Edmonton, Alberta
#10600From: Mike BerroDec 23, 1990 11:29 PM
Thanx for the info. —Mike
#10619From: BILL LEACHDec 24, 1990 8:07 AM
Mike; As already mentioned, there is no much that you can do. Using some form of diskcaching on the PC side could improve repeated access but that is about it. 73, bill
#10620From: BILL LEACHDec 24, 1990 8:08 AM
The Plus Development Hardcard XL 50 makes a nice addition to the AT BB. It appears to be a well designed card (best looking hardcard that I have seen to date). It is quite fast (bridge board is almost a pleasure to use. It would be if it wasn't for the OS 🙂 ). The card clears the Zorro II connector quite nicely (most do not). Installation is a snap except that you MUST rename "format!com" to "format.com" for the installation to work (that one is not their fault). The one sour apple is that the card won't boot with revs 3.5/3.6 of the bios. The Plus Development folks told me that BEFORE I bought the card. In fact the guy was really concerned that I clearly understood him. He did say that they are trying to fix the problem by working with the bios writer. On the positive side, the boot from floppy and switch to hd is almost complete by the time that the amy SS is complete anyway. The boot from floppy to hd is complete considerably quicker than a boot through janus! As far as I am concerned, having to have a bootable disk in the A: drive is a minor inconvenience for such a high performance drive. BTW, directories list much nicer too…… I had not thought about the fact that much of the screen disturbance is due to the disk related data that must be transfered rather than the display data. I mark this one a highly recommended. Usual disclaimers apply: your mileage may vary; I don't work for the folks; if your machine blows up, I am probably legally certifiable anyway…… 73, bill
#10635From: Mike BerroDec 24, 1990 11:15 AM
What is the price of the XL 50? I don't want to waste, err spend much money for the MSDOS side; I use it only for PrintShop and Word (my wife uses Word at work). —Mike
#10697From: BILL LEACHDec 25, 1990 9:36 AM
Mike; Ahhh, let me go look……. $459.00 is what I paid at a retail computer store so you probably can beat that some. 73, bill *********** MERRY CHRISTMAS *************
#10765From: Mike BerroDec 26, 1990 4:02 PM
Bill, Thanx for the info, but that's more than I paid for the BB. —Mike