CompuServe Thread

#Amiga Info Needed

21 messages in this thread
#13675From: randy schirmerDec 3, 1991 5:41 PM
I work at a state university and our TV studio is looking into buying some Amigas for production work. I'm somewhat familiar with Amiga and I believe it to offer the best price/performance ratio of any hardware platform. We mostly have IBM's and compatibles. Our art department has several Macs. Unfortunately, our Associate VP has hesitant on introducing another platform on campus. He believes that we could probably do everything we want on an IBM platform. I don't believe that we can, not without spending *alot* more money for special hardware. What I'm looking for is: 1. Specifics about what the Amiga can do and what type of cost differential there would be in configuring a similar IBM based system. 2. Specifics about what can't be duplicated on an IBM platform. 3. Anything else in general. Technical details would be valuable since the man I need to sell the idea to is very knowledgable. As I said, I am somewhat familiar with Amiga but I assume that someone here would be more eloquent in stating the reasons for getting an Amiga. The video toaster is not really an issue at this point however as I understand it, Newtek its own OEM video toaster as a repackaged Amiga. Thanks, Randy Schirmer
#13681From: Michael GerardDec 3, 1991 9:08 PM
The absolute first thing you should do is call 800-765-3406 and ask for a demo tape and literature on the Newtek Video Toaster. The tape and info is free of charge and it will leave no doubt in anyones mind that an Amiga-Toaster setup will not only enhance your current capabilities but save you thousands, even tens of thousands, of dollars in doing so. Look up the November (I think) MacUser magazine, and you'll find that the auhtor reviewing the last MacWorld show said something like "The biggest hit of the Mac Show wasn't even a Macanitosh, it was an Amiga." If you'd like, contact Spot Productions (a video & radio ad production company in San Jose) and ask for Frank Vanella (tell him I sent you) and ask how he uses the Amiga in conjunction with his Macs and IBM's. Their # is 408-224-1500. You can also contact Frank online here on CIS at user id# 76527,723. Since you're here on cis anyway, why not do a search online for periodical articles giving the facts & figures of the Amiga. USe the search terms AMIGA & VIDEO nad AMIGA & TOASTER. Since your on campus, maybe you can find someone with a copy of Todd Rundgren video "Change Myself", produced by TR himself ENTIRELY on AMiga-Toasters (ten of them actually)(the video is included on the Newtek Toaster demo tape). The Toaster features: Broadcast Quality Four Input Video Switcher Real-Time Digital Video Effects 35 ns Charachter Generator 16.8 million color paint system Interactive Color Processor Two 16.8 million color Frame Buffers 16.8 million color Frame Grabber Overlay Genlock Luminance Keyer 3D Modeling, Rendering and Animation. All of this at under $2,000. Put this video appliance in an Amiga 2500HD/68030 w/a bunch of ram, add a time base corrector (which you folks probably already have) and hook it up to your existing equipment and you've got one hell of a lot of video power for very little money. It not only does it's magic better than anything else under $100,000, it does some [ MORE ]
#13702From: Harry CallesisDec 4, 1991 8:37 PM
Michael – I realize I'm picking nits, but it's more appropriate now to say "under $3000". I myself _was_ considering a Toaster, but now it's out of my range. If Randy has to convince someone to go Amiga, let's make sure he doesn't find out later it's several hundred dollars more than he expected. Harry
#13682From: Michael GerardDec 3, 1991 9:08 PM
[ continuation ] things that haven't been possible before. Good-Luck! – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael
#13741From: randy schirmerDec 6, 1991 10:48 PM
Hi Michael, Commodore's been on campus and demo'd the Toaster. We also have a symposium on campus which they attended. Everyone agrees that what can be done is incredible. I need to be able to convince the powers that be that in order to do the same quality of work on an MSDOS platform, it would cost alot more Money than on an Amiga, and I'm not sure that you could even do as much. Those type PC's weren't made for video. I will look around for whatever I can find. Thanks. Randy
#13742From: Michael GerardDec 7, 1991 1:14 AM
Randy: One reference I left out (because it sort of ignores the Amiga, and is quite misleading in that respect) is an article on page 872 of the December Computer Shopper that talks about the Video Toaster… it really deals with NewTeks introduction of the "stand-alone toaster workstation" designed to allow Macintosh computers to controller the Amiga based toaster, but points out much of it's ability and value. If you show this to 'the powers that be' at your institution, be sure to point out the gross neglect of the author who stated "It is a self contained-system, which performs many of the Video Toaster functions from a window on the Macintosh, requiring no host computer". That statement is completely false, as the Toaster card is actually mounted in an Amiga 2000 series computer with the Amiga logo covered with a Video Toaster label, under a VAR agreement with Commodore (and, in the case of the 68030 based machine, GVP-Great Valley Products). – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael
#13745From: randy schirmerDec 7, 1991 8:34 AM
I have that issue of Computer Shopper. I'll check it out. I read about NewTek's 'stand alone' toaster in either Amiga World or in some other video magazine. I think it was in the context of explaining why Newtek was increasing the price of the new version of the toaster.(In order to bring the cost of an Amiga and Toaster card more in line with what they were asking for their own system. Randy
#13743From: Michael GerardDec 7, 1991 1:14 AM
BTW– Glad to hear that CBM made it on to the campus to provide a demo! – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael
#13746From: randy schirmerDec 7, 1991 8:38 AM
Wellll….I work at West Chester University which is maybe 5 miles from Commodore! But they have been here several times. Actually, there is another department that is interested in Amiga. This is not the TV studio. There is a good chance they'll get one although we wouldn't need the toaster. What I need to know is if I could import Animator Pro flics into Amiga Vision. The sales people didn't know what Animator was. I figure there's a conversion utility somewhere. Randy
#13812From: Jonathan HirschmanDec 9, 1991 1:46 AM
randy– There is no easy way to move .fli files into AmigaVision, or any other ANIM-compatible program, for that matter. There are two ways that I am familiar with: * There is a PD program (you can probably find it here) called "Flit" which will do a pretty crude conversion. Graphic quality is very marginal. * Extract all the frames of the .fli as .gif files (I believe that you can do this). Bring them over to the Amiga via modem, wire, or Cross-Dos. Convert them with ADPro or other conversion software. Use DPaint or other software to make them into an ANIM file. It can be done, but not gracefully. Jonathan – via Whap!
#13843From: KeithDec 9, 1991 8:40 PM
It may also be possible to convert the fli into the Cfast format used by Disney in the Animation Studio. The Animation studio builds and plays back both iff and cfast files from either the ms-dos or the Amiga version. I've been using this method to transport my amiga IFF anims over to the dos world with only minor problems. No conversion is necessary as Disney has basically created an IFF Anim viewer for the pc. Very nice…
#13871From: Jonathan HirschmanDec 10, 1991 3:23 PM
Keith– Hmm, this is very interesting information, indeed. However, how does one go from Cfast to .FLI format? Is this in the Disney format as well, or is there another way? Jonathan
#13874From: KeithDec 10, 1991 6:16 PM
Very good question… I will have to boot up my animation studio and see if it allows for the conversion or importation of .fli files. There is a convert program included with the MS-DOS version but I have never tried it out. I will give it a shot and let ya know.
#13884From: randy schirmerDec 10, 1991 9:55 PM
Hi Keith, could you let me know as well? Randy
#13901From: Jonathan HirschmanDec 11, 1991 1:23 PM
Keith, I would be very interested to find out if the Disney .fli<–>anim method works, since I might have an application involving porting a substantial amount of Amiga animation over to the PC. Jonathan
#13883From: randy schirmerDec 10, 1991 9:51 PM
Sorry, I asked the same question in my reply to your previous note. I should have read all the notes first! Randy
#13808From: Jonathan HirschmanDec 9, 1991 1:11 AM
Randy: Your ASSociate VP is wrong about trying to get video work done with a PC. It really won't happen, at least without a lot of grief. I deal with all three platforms at work, and video on the PC is like pulling teeth. First, animation is usually pretty bad on a PC, and when its any good, its only because of brute strength. I've yet to see smooth animation on a PC in any resolution beyond 320×200, albeit in 256 colors. Here are some things to think about: * Video on the PC is expensive. Things like genlocks (for overlaying graphics) tend to be either more expensive on the PC, or don't work as well. This is probably due to the NTSC clock on the Amiga, and the lack of one on the PC. * Software on the PC tends to be more limited, and more expensive. I understand that there are some decent titlers, however, but for animation, see the above. * The Amiga multi-tasks, and does so quickly and smoothly. This allows you jump from program to program quickly and easily. Its an inherently more efficient way to get things done as opposed to DOS. Seems to work out better in the hectic studio environment. * Unified file formats. Most animations on the Amiga are ANIM format, most still graphics IFF format. No problems with .fli, .gl, .tif, pcx, .bmp, .tga, etc… * Lastly, the Amiga is a niche machine to some degree, and we tend to see certain innovations first. Go to a dealer and check out the Toaster, DCTV, ADPro, DPaint IV, Imagine, Broadcast Titler, Pro Video Post…these are products that have no equal on the PC. Lastly, if there is a problem with having different platforms, make sure to note that Amiga can read 720k MS-DOS disks with a $20 utility, can run MS-DOS with several hardware and/or software products out there, can emulate the Mac (and share files with it that way), and can hook into a network. Programs like ADPro allow you to translate between formats with ease. One last thing: the last friend of mine that tried to produce [ MORE ]
#13809From: Jonathan HirschmanDec 9, 1991 1:11 AM
[ continuation ] video with a PC couldn't do it. He was given a 386/33 (fully blown), a VGA Producer card, two JVC S-VHS decks (high end industrial), 3DStudio and Autodesk Animator, a Targa+ card….in the end, he never did really complete the job, and what he did looked terrible. He hated using it. Leave the spreadsheets to the PC. Make this guy get you an Amiga. Jonathan – via Whap!
#13882From: randy schirmerDec 10, 1991 9:50 PM
You gave me some things that I can use. In fact I'll show him your reply, (with the last sentence edited out! Don't want him to dig his heels in!) He does want the best price/performance. I'll let you know what happens. BTW: I do work with a 386, Autodesk Animator. I'm getting 3dStudio for work. Did your friend use Animator Pro or just Animator? 320×200 really doesn't look all that great. One last thought…I assume that there are utilities to convert Animator files in order to use them with AmigaVision? Randy
#13903From: Jonathan HirschmanDec 11, 1991 1:32 PM
Randy– My friend uses Animator, but is getting Pro pretty soon. I find it hard to believe that the PC can animate very well in resolutions over 320×200, but I will soon see. I expect that my friend's results will be similiar to those that I saw in the Magni booth at the CAMP show – pretty lackluster. About buying 3D Studio: I really suggest that you DON'T. Why? Well, aside from the nice interface (and it is very nice, indeed), the program just ain't that great. Its rendering quality is OK, but it is SLOWWWWW….much slower than anything I've seen on the Amiga. Also, it is $$EXPENSIVE$$…for the price of 3D Studio, you could probably put together either all (or most) of an Amiga Toaster system, including Lightwave (the NewTek 3-D package). In case you have any doubts, find the Sept/Oct issue of New Media Age; they rate Lightwave head and shoulders over 3D Studio (it was given the AWESOME rating, while, if memory serves, 3DS was given DOES THE JOB). This is also a good reason to look into the Amiga. There are other 3D packages that do not come with display hardware, and are very cheap. I have a feeling that using an Amiga with either Draw4D Pro, or with Calligari 2 (and I might suggest a 3000 for this usage, due to its better real-time animation capability), and displaying through DCTV, might provide all the functionality you are looking for, at a much reduced price. Checkit out… Jonathan
#13941From: randy schirmerDec 12, 1991 10:04 PM
My place of employment is getting it. With our educational discount it costs $595 although the retail is $3000. It is available to general users for $1600 until Dec 20 (I think). Like I said earlier, we may wind up getting an Amiga for another area in the computer center. BTW: I forwarded your reply to our VP. It did make him consider what it is he wants the studio to do. We'll see what happens… Randy