CompuServe Thread

Comdex Info…

21 messages in this thread
#79914From: Charles HillDec 2, 1992 1:50 PM
They (PCMCIA ethernet) make sense to anyone who works as part of a large group (doctors in a hospital, workers in a warehouse) who want to use handheld computers. PCMCIA is the perfect size for something like Apple's Newton and other (forthcoming) PDAs and handhelds. A regular ethernet port is too big. Heck, they have call buttons and cable TV in every room in a hospital, why not thinnet cables so docs/nurses can just plug in and access the hospitals network? X-rays, cat scans, reports, lab results sent 'cross hospital in seconds instead of physically running them around. PCMCIA is great for those who want *real* portability (laptops are not useful when you can't sit and type) and access to the resources of major networks. -Chas
#80154From: SyndesisDec 3, 1992 9:55 PM
I fail to see what PCMIA has to do with portability – after all, if you're tied to a network, you're not very portable, are you? Even a P-card needs a full-size connector to the cable, no?
#80166From: David ArtDec 3, 1992 11:29 PM
John, What the PCMCIA cards bring the Amiga is comparably priced expansion hardware to other platforms. Yes, drivers will have to be written, and I'm not naive enough to think that manufacturers will put Amiga drivers into their cards, but it's a big step forward. Prior to PCMCIA, Amiga developers pretty much had to develop custom hardware _and_ the software for it. I think that we'll see a lot more in the line of software, now that companies don't have to design, build, and support custom hardware as well. I saw a magazine ad today for 3 PCMCIA cards from IBM – 1. Token-Ring 2. Ethernet 3. 3270 The list is growing. David
#80283From: SyndesisDec 4, 1992 8:14 PM
I'll buy that aspect of it. That makes sense. So why did CBM put it on the low-end computers and not the high-end systems? 🙂 That still leaves the drivers to be created and sold. CBM's Ethernet card costs dealers about $220, add a margin, are they still more expensive than PCMCIA Ethernet cards? As for modems, we've always enjoyed the economies of scale. What else do you stick in these ports?
#80317From: David ArtDec 5, 1992 12:06 AM
John, I don't have prices on the PCMCIA Ethernet cards, but the economics of scale have got to work in our favor regarding them. As far as what's coming for them, I couldn't say, but I see them as a way of letting the Amiga keep up with the latest industry hardware developments. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing some sort of PCMCIA interface on the high end machines, although not necessarily implemented in the same way as on the A600/A1200. David
#80397From: Sean LallyDec 5, 1992 7:33 PM
<What else do you stick in these ports?>> I know there's a Global Positioning System reciever that is designed for the HP 95LX. I think it's probably interfaced through the PCMCIA port. -Sean
#80403From: SyndesisDec 5, 1992 9:23 PM
Now *that* would be fun. 🙂
#80460From: Sean LallyDec 6, 1992 11:25 AM
I think so too! Just think of all the neat little experiments that could be done. -Sean
#80444From: Mike SchillerDec 6, 1992 5:11 AM
Sean: The HP95LX has a PCMCIA slot? I didn't know that! Hmm.. I might have to sell my Atari Portfolio and buy an HP, so when I get my A1200 I can at least share peripherals with it! 🙂 // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#80461From: Sean LallyDec 6, 1992 11:26 AM
Mike, Yes, a friend of mine has one and is using the slot for a memory card. I do think that would be great to have a radio modem (could they be made small enough?) in there and I could access CIS on the go… -Sean
#80502From: Leslie T. BartiromoDec 6, 1992 6:04 PM
There is a very unique adapter card that will allow PCMCIA cards to be used in the Atari Portfolio. Let me know if you want more info.
#80503From: Mike SchillerDec 6, 1992 6:22 PM
Leslie: Yes, I'm interested. If you can, can you email me more info? Thanks. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#80928From: Brian CowanDec 10, 1992 2:24 PM
Not on the "high end" machines? Funny, I thought the 4000 had one…. // Brian — Cruising on AutoPilot….. \X/
#80747From: Gregory HillDec 8, 1992 9:32 PM
The company I work for, New Media Corporation (1-800-CARDS4U), was formed to manufacture PCMCIA cards. We are currently shipping PSRAM cards for the 600 and 1200 which can be used as memory upgrades. At COMDEX we also showed PCMCIA modem, ethernet, and SCSI cards.
#80834From: Steve SetzerDec 9, 1992 3:56 PM
Are you (New Media Corp) planning on writing drivers for the modem, ethernet, and scsi cards for the Amiga 600/1200?
#80845From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiDec 9, 1992 5:20 PM
Does New Media have any plans to create Amiga drivers for the modem, ethernet, and SCSI cards? If so, email me ASAP! 🙂
#80212From: Charles HillDec 4, 1992 10:33 AM
The idea is that you can be portable then hook to a network to get or receive data — just not operate on it (you could, but that is beside the point). Yes, a full size connector is necessary, but there are different ways to implement it (pretty simple with thinnet or twisted pair). Laptops are too big to use while moving (walking, etc) while a pen-based handheld isn't. To get a computer that small requires smaller parts, thus PCMCIA which is a heck of a lot smaller than card-edge connectors. Not to mention easier to change PCMCIAs than internal cards. ROM upgrades (custom ROMs, like those on a hard-drive controller) could be updated simply by downloading the data via modem to the PCMCIA card (which has the hardware on it). Floppies are larger, more susceptableto wear/tear (with moving parts) and to dust & dirt. Write times are faster to a PCMCIA than a floppy. -Chs
#80282From: SyndesisDec 4, 1992 8:11 PM
I could see people leaving the PCMCIA card attached to the Ethernet, and not taking it with them when they move. For an office full of handhelds, that would make sense. But I don't see why doing it on PCMCIA makes that much difference. If networking is important to these handhelds, why not put it on the motherboard?
#80346From: Charles HillDec 5, 1992 7:38 AM
Why not on the motherboard? 'Simply 'cause that limits your market. PCMCIA are critical to small systems because of theirsize/weigt (almos none) and power consumption (3v, no moving parts). Network cards allow one unit to hook up to Ethernet, token ring, 3270 or arcnet networks just by plugging in different cards. Drivers for most major systems could reside on the card with the hardware. Another reason is copy protection. It makes it much more difficult to copy software when it includes custom hardware (notice there aren't too many copies of NewTek's Toaster Switcher software around). PCMCIA software could include a built in dongle that you'd never forget. -Chas
#80272From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiDec 4, 1992 7:43 PM
Not to pick on you in particular, John, but it's just the latest message and this the most convenient to reply to: OKAY, FOLKS, REPEAT AFTER ME! P C M C <— NOTE!!!!! I A Can you say PCMCIA? I knew you could!
#80280From: SyndesisDec 4, 1992 8:07 PM
I suspect I was getting it wrong – I dunno, five-letter acronyms? What's this world coming to?