CompuServe Thread

#student user

18 messages in this thread
#20334From: Terry WaiteFeb 12, 1992 11:41 PM
My son is going to take a class in C programming. What are some of the more appropriate C compilers for him to use as a student? He has an Amiga 500 with 1 megohm. Thanks!
#20339From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 13, 1992 10:12 AM
An Amiga 500 with one megohm? Gee, he's sure to show a lot of resistance to PC users, then. :^) Seriously, have him get the SAS C compiler. It's the best there is for the Amiga, IMHO. By the way… it's "one megabyte". "megohms" are a measure of electrical resistance. :^) –Ben
#20363From: Mike SpilleFeb 14, 1992 12:10 AM
Is SAS C really appropriate for a student working on a 500? For that he'd have to pay $200, and so-so compile times. And real problems if it's a floppy-only setup. I'd personally recommend checking out the free version of DICE. It's fast, and the price is right 😎 If that works out, then get the registered version (around $50?) and you're set (don't know about running on a floppy though). Commercially, I know Aztec runs on floppy-only systems, and has decent compile/link times even on an unaccelerated 500 (I do it all the time at home!). -Mike (note: I have a financial stake in Manx/Aztec C, so take this with a grain of salt!).
#20371From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 14, 1992 10:35 AM
Oh, come on. SAS can run fine off a floppy. Board Master was originally developed on a two floppy system, no problem, no disk swapping, everything went just fine (considering floppy speeds). SAS Compile times might be longer, that I couldn't say one way or the other. I don't think it's as important as the code produced, the flexibility of the compiler, the _support_ from the parent company (MANX has been most obviously absent around here and other places they used to frequent). SAS's features are excellent, and the price via mailorder isn't $200, either… he can do better than that. Picking Manx at this time would be a mistake, I beleive. –Ben
#20376From: Steve AhlstromFeb 14, 1992 2:02 PM
Ben, While I think I agree that picking up Manx now might be a mistake (because of lack of support) I would heartedly recommend DICE for the as the first compiler choice for someone who isn't sure that C is for them — the price is right and the compiler is _very_ good. -sja- via AP 0.04A
#20393From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 14, 1992 11:05 PM
Yes, Matt's work has always been excellent. –Ben
#20389From: John Toebes/SYSOPFeb 14, 1992 10:18 PM
SAS/C V4.0 was actually quite tolerable on a floppy system – part of that came from me only having an Amiga 500 in my office to develop and test on. As the 3000's became more standard and C= pushed more for code optimization verses compile performance, more effort went into that direction. I had to drop back to working on a 1000 with 2 floppies and it took HOURS to do what would have taken a couple of minutes on a 3000. The biggest problem was setting up a development disk – and even then I had to give up CPR and a few of the other toys that I was used to. On the other hand, DICE in that environment was quite tolerable and spiffy.
#20407From: Andy FinkelFeb 15, 1992 1:59 PM
Turning off GO helps a lot on a standard 68K system. andy
#20409From: John Toebes/SYSOPFeb 15, 1992 5:04 PM
I couldn't even fit GO on any of the disks, so turning it off wasn't really an issue. I don't even want to think about running GO on a floppy based 1Meg or less system.
#20459From: Andy FinkelFeb 17, 1992 9:40 AM
It's not pretty on any plain 68K machine, let me tell you. 🙂 andy
#20441From: Mike SpilleFeb 16, 1992 5:43 PM
Compuserve support definitely fell through the floor when I left Manx. Howver, the "other places they used to frequent" are still frequented quite often. BIX, BBS, and phone-in support did not change or fall off at all. -Mike
#20445From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 16, 1992 9:45 PM
That's not what I've seen people saying over on BIX in the past few months, Mike. BBS and phone in, I couldn't say one way or the other. I wish they'd get back on the ball – we all need someone nipping at our heels, just to keep us "pushing". –Ben
#20467From: Mike SpilleFeb 17, 1992 4:39 PM
That's strange – support seems to have been _better_ on BIX in the past few months then it was, say, 9 or 10 months ago. Version 5.2a was released sometime around October (I'm not sure of the exact date), and generated a fair amount of conversation in manx.aztec/amiga. In any case, BIX support is at least as good as SAS's at this point in time. -Mike
#20454From: Jeff SchweigerFeb 17, 1992 1:31 AM
Mike – Support on BIX all but disappeared for quite a while, before it started back up. It did finally return to a reasonable level of support. I haven't checked recently to see if the manx conference is still active. Jeff Schweiger
#20466From: Mike SpilleFeb 17, 1992 4:35 PM
Well, I can't say much about Manx's BIX activity from October '90 to about the summer of '91, since I wasn't on BIX then. But since the summer time, Manx support on BIX has been pretty good (IMHO). In fact, the 5.2a release was posted to the manx.update conference as soon as it was completed. -Mike
#20377From: SPC Superbase Tech SuppFeb 14, 1992 3:05 PM
Mike, DICE will compile on a floppy system, no problem (The more floppies, the better). Compile times on an Amiga 500 aren't bad. Darin – via Whap!
#20386From: John Toebes/SYSOPFeb 14, 1992 9:52 PM
One Meg might be pushing it for SAS/C. As a student compiler in that environment, DICE might be a better size fit.
#20452From: Terry WaiteFeb 16, 1992 11:27 PM
Gentlemen: Thanks for all the info. I forgot to mention that my son has a hard disk, but I expect lots of folks may be interested in what you had to say about running on floppies. I'm glad you couldn't see my face when I saw your comments about megohms. My BSEE degree may get recalled. I guess I was operating in the milliwatt range when I posted that message. You can bet I rechecked the spelling of "hard disk" in this reply. Thanks again. I'll forward the comments to my son today.