CompuServe Thread

Amiga Networking

16 messages in this thread
#50142From: Charles ConlowFeb 22, 1992 12:31 PM
I am currently in the R & D stage of a major project, and would like some feedback on a couple of thoughts/ideas I have have. Of course, the AmigaUser Forum is the first place I thought of… I would like to use Amiga computers in this project, and will start with that as a given. I don't have to explain the reasons why this is so, at least not in THIS forum 🙂 Problem 1: What is the current state of NETWORK support for Amigas, HARDWARE-wise? The project would involve a minimum of two computers, with a possibility of as many as eight. My current thought here is one Amiga as a SERVER, with the others as CLIENTS. Applications will need to access data storage on the SERVER, and perhaps other clients. Access in this case means load executables, read/write files load/save various binary images and usage of AmigaOS Release 2's record locking. Ideally, the SERVER should appear as an AmigaDOS device (NET: ?) to any and all CLIENTS that are attached to it. Comments? Problem 2: Given a response to Problem 1, what are the SOFTWARE issues involved? Is there native Amiga software to run the network? Is it transparent (i.e. the NET: device mentioned above)? Creating a major project using such software is difficult enough… are there development tools available? Documentation? Comments? If you all can point me in the appropriate direction, thanks a lot! If you just have some pithy coments and snappy repartee, also thanks! PS – When can we expect a disk-less, boot-from-network Amiga Work Station? Charles Conlow – via Whap!
#50147From: SPC Superbase Tech SuppFeb 22, 1992 1:45 PM
Charles, Take a look at ENLAN-DFS. There was a thread here in Amigauser about 3 weeks ago talking about it. Sounded great. Uses the Commodore A2065 Ethernet card. It's a peer-to-peer network, not client server. What's your big project? And what AmigaDOS 2 record locking are you talking about? Darin – via Whap!
#50235From: Charles ConlowFeb 23, 1992 11:43 AM
Darin: Thanks for the pointer. If the messages are still there, I'll go and capture the thread. I've also received a reply from Nick @ Interworks (the ENLAN-DFS people) and that seems to be the way to go. Charles Charles Conlow – via Whap!
#50238From: Charles ConlowFeb 23, 1992 11:44 AM
Darin: About AmigaOS Release 2 record locking… The AmigaDOS manual describes the function(s) for locking a series of bytes (record) within a file for exclusive access by an application. This lock affects only those specified bytes, not the remainder of the file. Functions are LockRecord(), LockRecords(), UnLockRecord() and UnLockRecords(). Charles Conlow – via Whap!
#50287From: Christopher LapriseFeb 23, 1992 7:33 PM
A Superbase techie isn't aware of record-locking?? OUCH!!
#50318From: SPC Superbase Tech SuppFeb 23, 1992 11:39 PM
No, I'm aware of record locking, but I didn't know that Workbench 2.04 had byte-range locking within files. Darin
#50164From: Nick FrabottaFeb 22, 1992 5:33 PM
Charles, Problem 1: Hardware-wise you're best off with Ethernet. Even with two computers, you'll be mountains ahead of any serial or parallel "networking". You don't want to be loading executables over a 19.2K baud link. Once you're on Ethernet, expanding past two is really easy to do. The Commodore A2065 is _the_ card for the Amiga. Others exist(ed) but the A2065 is by far the most popular choice. Problem 2: There is native Amiga software. There is ENLAN-DFS. It's designed to be transparent – disk drives and directories from the server have icons on the client. ENLAN-DFS makes your clients look as though they've "sprouted" more drives. You can attach to a server's printers, too. If your application will multi-task with itself on the same machine there's no reason it should not work over ENLAN-DFS. This means, as you mention, properly using the AmigaDOS record (byte-range) locking of 2.0 to arbitrate access to shared databases. Booting a "diskless" Amiga today requires a floppy disk to get the system and network up and then Assign'ing your logicals (DEVS:, S:, SYS:, etc.) over to a network drive. It's no more difficult than what you might do to boot an Amiga and run from a RAM: disk. Nick Frabotta Interworks Creators of ENLAN-DFS
#50236From: Charles ConlowFeb 23, 1992 11:43 AM
Nick: Thanks for the info! Sounds exactly what I'm looking for! Can you send me a data-pak or brochure describing the specifics of the ENLAN-DFS software? Would certainly appreciate it… Charles Conlow Artemis Systems 2144 California Street NW Suite 808 Washington, DC 20008 An aside concerning the A2065 Ethernet card… is this manufactured by C-A itself, or someone else? My concern is that should C-A drop support, can I second-source the cards from elsewhere? Thanks again for your help. Charles Conlow – via Whap!
#50222From: john loweryFeb 23, 1992 9:23 AM
Carlos, Check in the AmigaVinder forum and ask for BlackBelt Systems. They were discussing the very questions about a system they were running or testing or just heard about. The guy's name was BEN. JOHN – The Lost Southerner!!
#50237From: Charles ConlowFeb 23, 1992 11:43 AM
John: I'll certainly check into anythig BlackBelt has available, but it seems the Ethernet/ENLAN-DFS route is the way to go. Charles Conlow – via Whap!
#50307From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 23, 1992 9:50 PM
We are testing ENLAN-DFS. :^) Boy, it's amazing the way things can get twisted round. :^)) –Ben
#50351From: Charles ConlowFeb 24, 1992 12:18 PM
Ben: Rest assured -I KNOW- how things can get twisted around, here as elsewhere. Please post your test results about ENLAN-DFS when appropriate. As you may have read, I'm researching various methods of network support for an Amiga based application. If nothing fills the void, then I'll be forced to go to another platform (i.e. MS-DOS beasts). Charles Conlow – via Whap!
#50401From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 24, 1992 11:59 PM
I'll tell you about ENLAN-DFS right now. If it's not perfect for the AMiga network, I sure as heck have not been able to figure out a reason why. :^) We use it very heavily every day and it NEVER burps. It's trivial to install, is extremely, even unreasonably fast, has all the utilities you'd want, handles our rough environement (systems crashing due to software in development not quite ok yet) with no sweat at all. We go hour after hour mounting and demounting volumes, works perfectly all the time. Go for it. I doubt anything could be better, AND I doubt anything will even be as good. –Ben
#50443From: Charles ConlowFeb 25, 1992 10:10 AM
Ben: Thanks for telling me what I wanted to hear 🙂 Now I can continue on my merry developmeny way, without having to worry about building-n support for odd and assorted external stuff. Charles Conlow – via Whap!
#50732From: Greg MalcangiFeb 27, 1992 8:05 PM
Dear Ben, I have an A2000HD and am just about to get a second. My PA is to use one and I the other we both work in different parts of the same building but running a cable should not be a problem. My requirements are that I can access the printer attactched to the PA's A2000, that I can send him messages without going to his office and that I can enter information to SBPro4 and Wordworth (Wordpublisher). Could you make any sugestions as to how easy/expensive it is to accomplish my requirements and indeed what features are in fact available when "Networking". Thanks in advance, Greg Malcangi. 100031,3502 – via Whap!
#50805From: Black Belt SystemsFeb 28, 1992 8:16 PM
It's very, very easy to do – bordering on the <yawn> level. The product is called ENLAN-DFS and it makes sharing printers an absolute no-sweat experience. We do it here all the time now. As far as talking to applications across the network, you can share the files from one machine to the other – so as long as you can get at the files, should be no problem there either. Cost – 2 network cards, CBM 2065 Ethernet cards (price call your dealer, I dunno, sorry) and the network software itself, for which price you can ask Nick Frabotta of Interworks – he hangs round here. –Ben