CompuServe Thread

#>giggle<

4 messages in this thread
#4451From: Bill RobertsJan 2, 1989 12:24 PM
And building hundreds and hundreds of modules that do useful things that can be shared (and sold as low cost ways to add to your programs). Reusable software should be the battle cry!
#4480From: Erv ThompsonJan 2, 1989 11:27 PM
But the lack of any kind of standard for Modula-2 is a real hindrence. I found more portability in C then anything in Modula-2. There are now 4 available Modula-2 compilers for the Amiga and even fairly simple code has to be fixed to compile for each one. Everyone seems to interpret Wirth in their own way.
#4523From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 3, 1989 11:57 PM
But Erv, C code has to be fixed to get it to compile with each of the C compilers, too. Betty
#4582From: Erv ThompsonJan 4, 1989 11:01 PM
In retrospect, that is true, to some degree. At least some standards, beyond basic syntax, are part of the C language. Modula-2 has really only one or two "standard" libraries from which to borrow. And those aren't guaranteed to be identical amoung various implementations.