CompuServe Thread

#MPEGII

12 messages in this thread
#38031From: barry mccleaveJan 27, 1994 3:14 PM
I was looking for a card to do MPEGII compression/expansion with capture/playback video and sound for IBM compatibles. Vince Pilgrim in the Graphics Vendors A forum said to ask Jerry Hatchett in this forum but I don't know his ID. If there is a card, I suppose it has an Amiga counterpart or he wouldn't have sent me here. I read that a company called Xilinx or something similar had one in beta. Any one familiar with the company that could give me a phone number. Thanks
#38050From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 27, 1994 11:39 PM
Barry, Here I am, but unfortunately know zero about MPEG cards… Sorry, Jerry
#38075From: barry mccleaveJan 28, 1994 12:53 PM
Well glad to meet you; if you learn anything of interest I'm all ears.
#38395From: Vince PilgrimFeb 7, 1994 5:02 AM
Jerry, appologies for that misdirect on the MPEG card. Guess I missed that one <grin>. For Berry, I noted an advert in the latest Desk Top Video World magazine on this item from a company called Xingit with a voice number of (800) 2-XINGIT (I just hate it when they do that) and a "normal" FAX number of (805) 473-0147. If you get the February issue, it is on page 24 (this isn't intended as an advert, gang). Sorry for not having this info readily available when you posted in the vendor forum, but I had not gotten the latest DTVW rag at that time <grin>. This may or may not be what you are looking for, but it may be a starting point. Thanks for letting me use a reply to you to shoot that note to Berry and, again, applogies for that misdirect on this. Vince
#38413From: JERRY HATCHETTFeb 7, 1994 7:03 PM
Vince, No problem on the misdirect. Speaking of DTVW, I found the latest issue to be quite sad, both in physical appearance and content… Jerry
#38440From: Vince PilgrimFeb 8, 1994 5:16 PM
Jerry, I've noticed that a number of the ones that I usually get have been kind of dropping in content and advertising. Wonder if there is a "new year" slump going on. There wasn't as much there as has been in the past, but I have faith that it will pick up again <grin>. Oh yes! I sent another one over here, although not pointed to you, who had some questions on doing some production work with his computer. Seems like I am seeing more and more related stuff showing up for PC and MAC platforms than ever before. Wonder if we will see a "Toaster In A Window" some day <grin>. Guess the general public is getting interested in doing fancy stuff on their home videos now. Vince
#38467From: JERRY HATCHETTFeb 9, 1994 10:50 AM
Vince, The latest issue of DTVW makes one wonder if they were ready to go monthly… Jerry
#38486From: Vince PilgrimFeb 9, 1994 11:23 PM
Jerry, now that you mention it, I hadn't even noticed that it went to a monthly. Well, maybe times will get better for them since they have had some really good stuff in the past. I'd kind like to see some really good open and honest discussions on the merits and pitfalls of the various formats currently in use. Maybe something like U-Matic SP vs BetaCam vs one inch "C" for the hard core editing jobs using real world source material rather than test frames. As you know, the test frames tell a lot, but leave a lot to be desired in a true evaluation of any system since they won't be what the customer gets. Had I had the opportunity to see those Panasonic S-VHS machines in action, I would have saved a bundle on that fiasco. I just hate those "performance check reports" where someone sticks a MB through a machine and states how much better it is with a 425 line resolution than format X with "only 320 lines". Shame is that a lot of potential customers really have no idea of how much really is involved in getting a good quality signal off the tape. A lot more than a monochrome MB signal will hit that circuitry and how it holds up in a real world environment is a lot more telling of a particular format or system than scads of controlled condition tests. (Personal opinion only, here.) Vince
#38549From: JERRY HATCHETTFeb 11, 1994 12:29 PM
AMEN, Vince! What matters is what the end product, usually VHS, looks like to the customer. All else is virtually irrelevant, IMHO. I did go ahead and take the UVW plunge a few days ago, and am proud to say that Betacam SP dubs to VHS very nicely… Jerry
#38573From: Vince PilgrimFeb 11, 1994 10:56 PM
Jerry, on your "Betacam SP dubs to VHS very nicely", I sure hope it will do more than that <grin>. Been looking seriously at it here too, but will probably hold off for a while. Any pointers on things to look out for? I am looking for another ten thousand miles out of the U-Matic SP machines first <LOL>. Vince
#38595From: JERRY HATCHETTFeb 12, 1994 12:48 PM
Vince, Due to inclement weather, I've barely gotten to play with the new UVW decks at all… 🙁 The main reason I went ahead and took the plunge was because I had a couple of clients specify Betacam SP be used on their jobs, and I was looking at spending a lot of bucks just to rent gear and have nothing when it was done. I'll post my findings on the UVW's as I go, if you or anyone else is interested… Jerry
#38599From: Vince PilgrimFeb 12, 1994 5:07 PM
Jerry, on your "I'll post my findings on the UVW's as I go, if you or anyone else is interested", would be quite interested in knowing how they perform in real world service. Thanks for any and all information you can provide. This may be the best way to get the real story on how equipment performs rather than attempting to rely on the generic lab tests that are generally provided within the publications. Vince