CompuServe Thread

#Query from WP50 IBM user

16 messages in this thread
#28589From: Randall HitchensJan 3, 1989 12:43 PM
Ron, Thanks for the info and the advice. I am not very familiar with the expansion capability of the 2000. And I assume from your message that there is a 2500? Can I add a bridgecard to a 2000 directly? I also want to add a hard disk that, I understand, may be shared by the IBM board. Is there enough room and power on the 2000 and, dollar for dollar, which is the biggest bang for the buck – upgrade the 1000 with an exansion chassis or buy a 2000? Also, you mention the microsoft mouse interface actually uses the Amiga mouse. Is that true as far as all DOS mouse-driven software is concerned? More generally, how compatible is compatible for the bridgecard Thanks again, Randall
#28604From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 3, 1989 3:29 PM
Randall, The A2500 is an A2000 with an included 40 Meg HD and the A2620 co processor card (68020) with 2 Meg of 32 bit RAM on the card (4 Meg max on the card). Yes, a BridgeBoard can be added to an A2000. Right now, there is only the A2088 bridgeboard (8088 processor running at 4.77MHz). In the future there will be a bridgeboard with an 80286 chip running at a higher speed. Yes, right now, with the bridgeboard you can share a HD mounted on either side with the other side. The bridgeboard is fully compatible…that is, if it'll run on a clone, it'll run on the bridgeboard. The mouse useage isn't available yet, that will come with the upgrade software to link the bridge and the Amiga sides. The A2000 is your best bet…200w power supply vs 90w on the A1000 and built in buffered slots. Don
#28808From: Randall HitchensJan 4, 1989 4:38 PM
Thanks, Don. Good stuff, right to the point. Randall
#28633From: RON TROYJan 3, 1989 7:54 PM
There are, if I understand correctly, a few versions of the 2500, which is really means there are some preconfigured versions of the 2000 – all really the same base machine plus add ons. Yes, the 2000 can take the existing xt type bridge, or the upcoming at type. HD's can be shared between the 2 sides, though separate hd's are better in many cases. I think a 2000 in the long run gives much better bang for the buck. As for the mouse on the IBM side, it is my understanding that any software that can use the microsoft mouse should use this. As for compatibility, most IBM software works correctly. Ron
#28702From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 3, 1989 11:10 PM
Ron, The use of the Mouse on the IBM side isn't available yet, it's to come in the next update of the JANUS software. Don
#28846From: RON TROYJan 4, 1989 9:02 PM
The 80286 board isn't, at least as far as I know, available yet either. Are you saying that even the 8088 board will add mouse support with the new software? Ron
#28939From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 5, 1989 1:58 AM
Ron, Yes Don
#28777From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 4, 1989 10:46 AM
Ron, what do you mean, "a few versions of the 2500"? A 2500 is an Amiga 2000 with a 2620 card + 2M of 32 bit memory, a 2090A, and a 40M hard disk. I don't understand the difference you were making. Betty
#28851From: RON TROYJan 4, 1989 9:03 PM
I seem to remember a 2500hd, ux, and maybe one other version. Maybe I remember wrong. They are, as I stated, all Amiga's with certain options included in the package. Ron
#28941From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJan 5, 1989 2:05 AM
Ron, Let's clarify that…of course they were all Amigas…10 years from now the Amiga A5000 (or whatever) will be an Amiga. The A2500 series (HD, UX and AT) are ALL A2000's with various add-on boards included with the package. The base machine is no different that what you could buy a year ago. Don
#29175From: RON TROYJan 6, 1989 6:10 PM
That's true – I think you got this out of context. When I mentioned that there a few different 2500's someone said there was only one, which of course is not true. Ron
#29405From: Steve AhlstromJan 8, 1989 1:01 AM
Currently, for sale, in the US, NOW, there is only 1 2500. -sja
#29021From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 5, 1989 7:06 PM
Ron, Right now, the 2500 is available. It comes with a hard disk, but not as an option – it just has it. It is a 2000 with 40M hard disk, 2090A, and 2620 with 2Meg of 32-bit memory. This can be increased to 4M. But there is only one version, currently. The UX is the forthcoming Unix machine, which will be based on the 2000 also. I think it is to have an 80M harddisk, 2090A, and some different cards, including the Unix operating system, but I don't recall all of them. Anyway, thanks for the explanation. There are usually options, but I guess I didn't consider those to be the same as different versions of the machine. Betty
#28921From: John DraperJan 5, 1989 12:59 AM
Betty, Though not out yet, there are a few configurations of the 2500 planned. One will have an 80 meg HD, another will have Unix, and another, the '286 Bridge card. I think they will all be called 2500s, with a different suffix. -larry
#29136From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJan 6, 1989 9:12 AM
But Larry – all of those are just 2500s with different options, aren't they? Not really different versions of the machine. Well, maybe the Unix machine will be. Certainly the bridgeboard is an addon that does not make the machine a different version. Or maybe the question is – just what constitutes a different version. Or maybe it doesn't make enough difference for us to argue about it. 🙂 Betty
#29156From: John DraperJan 6, 1989 1:55 PM
Betty, Well, I look at it this way. If it is a 'bundled' machine, sold with the extras, and has a price for the bundle, and even has a different designator, then it is definitely either a variation or a different model. I am of mixed feelings as to whether to even call an Amiga with a Bridge the same machine as an unpolluted one. -larry