CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Hardware

A1000 Audio Filter

7 messages in this thread
#129384From: Richard Rae/SYSOPJun 13, 1988 10:22 PM
"As I recall, both articles had problems with the schematics." What can I tell you? When I submit an ARC file including the text of a column and IFF pictures of all illustrations, which ARE CORRECT, and someone at the magazine decides for whatever reason to completely REDRAW those illustrations and introduce a glaring error… well, it's pretty much out of my hands. I'd love to have an opportunity to check galley proofs, but they don't give authors that option. The sad thing is, the redrawn illustrations are layed out identically to my original submissions, sans the errors. Beats me why they felt they had to redraw them. I can't say about Perry's article, but I wouldn't be surprised if his errors originated at the magazine offices also.
#129706From: John DraperJun 16, 1988 11:11 AM
According to Perry, the errors in his article were indeed introduced at the magazine. Sems to me it would be a lot better if the magazine used an automated IFF to PostScript convertor, rather than relying on the talents of someone doing it by hand.
#129837From: John FoustJun 16, 1988 9:58 PM
Hmm. So how do we explain all the other errors in Amazing? 🙂
#129886From: John DraperJun 16, 1988 11:44 PM
Dunno John, but I would rather try to explain all the errors in Amazing Computing than I would for Amigaworld. 😉 -larry
#129886From: John DraperJun 16, 1988 11:44 PM
Dunno John, but I would rather try to explain all the errors in Amazing Computing than I would for Amigaworld. 😉 -larry
#129837From: John FoustJun 16, 1988 9:58 PM
Hmm. So how do we explain all the other errors in Amazing? 🙂
#129706From: John DraperJun 16, 1988 11:11 AM
According to Perry, the errors in his article were indeed introduced at the magazine. Sems to me it would be a lot better if the magazine used an automated IFF to PostScript convertor, rather than relying on the talents of someone doing it by hand.