CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Amiga at Work

#RUN LocksCLI

27 messages in this thread
#133201From: Christopher TolmieJul 4, 1988 3:56 PM
Hi All! I've got a question to ask you. Has anyone had any problem when using the RUN command? I've found on occasion that even when RUNning a program I get a locked-up CLI window. Then when I check with STATUS, I find a task with RUN next to it. I have yet been able to get BREAK to work. BREAK 2 all 2 being the task which RUN is using. BTW I've never been able to get BREAK to work! If anyone has any info on run having a bug of this sort I'd like to hear about it and also if 1.3 will fix it. I'd also like to know what break really is doing when I invoke it. BTW I'm using a B2000 with an additional 2 Meg of RAM. Thanks, Chris
#133203From: Steve AhlstromJul 4, 1988 4:00 PM
Chris, It's funny you should ask that. In the last 2 weeks I've started having that problem. I RUN a program, terminate the program, yet the CLI isn't released. Weird. I have no idea what's causing it. I installed ARP 5-6 weeks ago. Could that be it?
#133259From: Christopher TolmieJul 4, 1988 11:38 PM
Steve, I've got ARP (latest release from MicroSmiths) and I've been wondering if that is it too, but there is no RUN command in ARP. I've compared the file size with run in my original WBench and it's the same size. It is weird because it does it only occasionally no real pattern to it. I'm gonna pin down the circumstances somehow though. Thanks for the reply, Chris
#133262From: Steve AhlstromJul 4, 1988 11:48 PM
If you do pin it down, please let me know. I've had it happen 3 times in the last 2-3 weeks. The only changes in my environment has been ARP and the use of WShell.
#133263From: Christopher TolmieJul 5, 1988 12:00 AM
OK Steve, I'm gonna try it just happens and when it does I kinda get worked up and forget what I was doing. But I'm gonna try. Chris
#133362From: Ray LambertJul 5, 1988 12:01 PM
ARP, does have a RUN command, however, it's got a different name. ARP's RUN command is called ARUN. I've been using it without any problems. Ray
#133449From: Christopher TolmieJul 5, 1988 9:46 PM
Ray, I thought ARUN was for Resident commands and programs. So far I haven't gotten any programs to stay resident too long that weren't made to stay resident. Chris
#133540From: Ray LambertJul 6, 1988 2:59 PM
ARUN is the ARP replacement for AmigaDOS' RUN. It's just like RUNBACK but supposedly better (smaller anyway). I think there is something else called RRUN to handle the resident stuff in ARP. Ray
#133540From: Ray LambertJul 6, 1988 2:59 PM
ARUN is the ARP replacement for AmigaDOS' RUN. It's just like RUNBACK but supposedly better (smaller anyway). I think there is something else called RRUN to handle the resident stuff in ARP. Ray
#133449From: Christopher TolmieJul 5, 1988 9:46 PM
Ray, I thought ARUN was for Resident commands and programs. So far I haven't gotten any programs to stay resident too long that weren't made to stay resident. Chris
#133362From: Ray LambertJul 5, 1988 12:01 PM
ARP, does have a RUN command, however, it's got a different name. ARP's RUN command is called ARUN. I've been using it without any problems. Ray
#133263From: Christopher TolmieJul 5, 1988 12:00 AM
OK Steve, I'm gonna try it just happens and when it does I kinda get worked up and forget what I was doing. But I'm gonna try. Chris
#133262From: Steve AhlstromJul 4, 1988 11:48 PM
If you do pin it down, please let me know. I've had it happen 3 times in the last 2-3 weeks. The only changes in my environment has been ARP and the use of WShell.
#133259From: Christopher TolmieJul 4, 1988 11:38 PM
Steve, I've got ARP (latest release from MicroSmiths) and I've been wondering if that is it too, but there is no RUN command in ARP. I've compared the file size with run in my original WBench and it's the same size. It is weird because it does it only occasionally no real pattern to it. I'm gonna pin down the circumstances somehow though. Thanks for the reply, Chris
#133264From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 5, 1988 12:05 AM
Steve, IF you're using FFS and 1.3, there is a strong possibility that you'll have to put RUN into RAM: to get it to work. I had the same problem until I did that. Don
#133267From: Steve AhlstromJul 5, 1988 12:19 AM
I am not running 1.3. FFS works great. The problem did not surface until I installed ARP and WShell (is there an echo in here?)
#133274From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 5, 1988 12:36 AM
Steve, Yes, I saw that…but try to put run into RAM: and then add ram: to your path. See if that works….it may well be the problem. The combination of WShell, ARP and FFS may act in the same manner as 1.3 and FFS….the symptoms are certainly the same. Don
#133319From: Steve AhlstromJul 5, 1988 2:50 AM
No they aren't. It's intermittent. I've seen the problem 2-3 times. When I ran 1.3 the problem with RUN occured everytime. That's why I don't use it.
#133319From: Steve AhlstromJul 5, 1988 2:50 AM
No they aren't. It's intermittent. I've seen the problem 2-3 times. When I ran 1.3 the problem with RUN occured everytime. That's why I don't use it.
#133274From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 5, 1988 12:36 AM
Steve, Yes, I saw that…but try to put run into RAM: and then add ram: to your path. See if that works….it may well be the problem. The combination of WShell, ARP and FFS may act in the same manner as 1.3 and FFS….the symptoms are certainly the same. Don
#133267From: Steve AhlstromJul 5, 1988 12:19 AM
I am not running 1.3. FFS works great. The problem did not surface until I installed ARP and WShell (is there an echo in here?)
#133264From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 5, 1988 12:05 AM
Steve, IF you're using FFS and 1.3, there is a strong possibility that you'll have to put RUN into RAM: to get it to work. I had the same problem until I did that. Don
#133203From: Steve AhlstromJul 4, 1988 4:00 PM
Chris, It's funny you should ask that. In the last 2 weeks I've started having that problem. I RUN a program, terminate the program, yet the CLI isn't released. Weird. I have no idea what's causing it. I installed ARP 5-6 weeks ago. Could that be it?
#133211From: Doug WingerJul 4, 1988 4:45 PM
Chris, Certain things grab the spawning CLI for use as Stderr, with some using it for stdout and stdin as well. As long as they're still running they hold on to the window. The well-behaved ones detach or open their own windows. Some will allow themselves to be 'killed' (Snipit being a nice example) so you can close the window. It's a case of operator beware, or choosing what you intend to RUN carefully. Sometimes, a redirection to NIL: will help. e.g. RUN >NIL: thingie >NIL: but not always. The safest method is never to close the CLI when you've RUN something from it unless you're sure that it hasn't grabbed the window. A quick check of each thing will allow you to be sure of how it will behave.
#133260From: Christopher TolmieJul 4, 1988 11:40 PM
Doug, I didn't do an ENDCLI just used RUN to start something from my CLI so I could still use it but never got the prompt back! WEIRD Chris
#133260From: Christopher TolmieJul 4, 1988 11:40 PM
Doug, I didn't do an ENDCLI just used RUN to start something from my CLI so I could still use it but never got the prompt back! WEIRD Chris
#133211From: Doug WingerJul 4, 1988 4:45 PM
Chris, Certain things grab the spawning CLI for use as Stderr, with some using it for stdout and stdin as well. As long as they're still running they hold on to the window. The well-behaved ones detach or open their own windows. Some will allow themselves to be 'killed' (Snipit being a nice example) so you can close the window. It's a case of operator beware, or choosing what you intend to RUN carefully. Sometimes, a redirection to NIL: will help. e.g. RUN >NIL: thingie >NIL: but not always. The safest method is never to close the CLI when you've RUN something from it unless you're sure that it hasn't grabbed the window. A quick check of each thing will allow you to be sure of how it will behave.