CompuServe Thread

#DECnet for Amiga

46 messages in this thread
#85596From: Robert AlbrechtJan 21, 1990 1:56 AM
To all Amigans; I just tested the coolest thing I have seen for the Amiga in a long time. It's called DECnet, yes real DECnet. This is the type of network that Digital Equipment Corp. uses to connect together VAXes and other computers. I am a alpha tester for this product, called ENLAN. It can be used to connect Amiga to Amiga, Amiga to DEC or any combination. I was able to get into the second largest DECnet network in the world (next to DEC itself) and my Amiga 1000 was just another node like all of the big VAXes. REAL networking has finally come to the Amiga, every computer can be the server, including your Amiga. I believe this product is going to open many oppertunities for the Amiga. This is going to be HOT. If you are interested in the ENLAN network the name of the company is: INTERWORKS 195 Main St. Suite 230 Milford, MA 01757 P.S. I have NO financial stake in this company, I'm just impressed with what I could do with my Amiga connected into a large wide-area network.
#85660From: Thomas HoladayJan 21, 1990 3:50 PM
How does the VAX appear? As an Amiga volume? Does Workbench look for a Disk.info file on the VAX and then draw a disk icon?
#85703From: Robert AlbrechtJan 21, 1990 6:23 PM
You go through utilities like Copy, Dir, etc. Since the standard Amiga commands know nothing of DECnet this is necesary. I understand that there is a possibility that the network access will be completly transparent. At this point there is no workbench support, but there will be in the final version. (So I am told).
#85711From: Thomas HoladayJan 21, 1990 7:51 PM
Is it working with an ethernet board?
#85871From: Nick FrabottaJan 22, 1990 8:11 PM
I can answer a few more questions with respect to Interworks and the DECnet product we're working on. To get the legalities out of the way, the name of the product is the ENLAN(tm) Network System. ENLAN is a trademark of Interworks. There, I feel a lot better now. Anyways, the network system as it stands today is a end-node implementation of DECnet Phase IV for the Amiga. As such, it has a peer relationship with any other DECnet nodes connected or routed to it. That means the Amiga is functional in any valid DECnet configuration – Amiga to Amiga, Amiga to VAX/VMS, Amiga to Ultrix (tested and working) and theoretically to PCs and MACs running DECnet (not tried yet). The Amiga supports "Asynchronous DECnet" with serial speeds up to 25K baud using the internal serial hardware. Third-party serial boards should be able to run at higher speeds. Answering the obvious next question, yes, we are working on an Ethernet board. We have a system running in-house (it's awesome) but production units are still a ways away. The ENLAN Network System has task-to-task communication, named and numbered network objects and a set of file utilities. It also has dial-in and dial-out modem control for dynamic connections. Forthcoming is network virtual terminal capability ("set host") with multiple outgoing links. The system has been running since September and is quite solid. We are currently looking for alpha test sites and also for developers wishing to add network capability to their product. Interworks is a member of the Amiga Network Working Group. Interested parties may contact me here via EasyPlex or a letter to the following address. Nick Frabotta Interworks 195 Main St., Suite 230 Milford, MA 01757
#85895From: Thomas HoladayJan 22, 1990 10:02 PM
Is Interworks set up to acommodate busloads of pilgrims for visits to the site to see with their own eyes Amiga running DECnet over Ethernet? Your own board? Not Ameristar's?
#86046From: Nick FrabottaJan 23, 1990 7:22 PM
WRT pilgrims, if that happens I hope you've got a reservation. 🙂 And yes, our own board.
#86321From: John DraperJan 25, 1990 10:50 AM
Does your company have any plans to do further networking software? I am particularly interested in NFS capabilities.
#88879From: Christopher R. HertelFeb 6, 1990 6:14 PM
I heard a mention of Ethernet. I would like to suggest that you look at the NODEM from Adaptec. The NODEM is an SCSI to Ethernet bridge. It could be less expensive than an Ethernet card for those who have an SCSI controller. There is also a parallel to Ethernet device available. I've seen it in the Black Box catalog.
#88899From: RON TROYFeb 6, 1990 7:52 PM
But is there supporting software available for the Amiga?
#89501From: Christopher R. HertelFeb 10, 1990 2:43 PM
You gotta have the tools before you can build the house…
#89523From: RON TROYFeb 10, 1990 5:26 PM
Very true. And so far all I have are descriptions of tools; you can't build much that way.
#89051From: Nick FrabottaFeb 7, 1990 6:20 PM
There are several SCSI to Ethernet adapters floating around. It would be real nice for someone with an A1000, if there's any left after the Big Trade, to be able to hook up to Ethernet via their SCSI or parallel interface.
#89506From: Christopher R. HertelFeb 10, 1990 3:02 PM
Not just for someone with an A1000. The pricing of SCSI to Ethernet adapters is fairly competative (from what I know), and I would rather use the SCSI bus that is in my system to its potential before filling another slot! Besides, an SCSI to Ethernet box would be great for someone with an A500. One SCSI host adapter on the expansion port would be better than worrying about passthrough, etc. Each SCSI bus can support eight devices, each with eight logical units, each with 256 subunits. That's a lot of potential!
#89552From: Nick FrabottaFeb 10, 1990 8:12 PM
Chris, I agree. I should have said _especially_ for someone with an A1000; but yes, a SCSI to Ethernet adapter would be applicable to all Amiga's that have (an expandable) SCSI disk adapter.
#90114From: Robert AlbrechtFeb 13, 1990 10:56 PM
Not only would a scuzzie to ethernet adapeter be useful for Amiga, but just about any computer. Hmmm, this could be a plan. -BOB-
#90332From: Christopher R. HertelFeb 15, 1990 1:26 PM
I know of two that exist. The Adaptec is MUCH more affordable, but the Kinetics claims to pass DECnet protocol. I don't know why the Adaptec wouldn't so maybe it's just a marketing ploy from Kinetics (their product is about twice the Adaptec price). Adaptec is also a very very major company in the SCSI world. They make a large number of SCSI related products, including testing and development kits. They also make the SCSI host adapters that Digital Equipment Corp (DEC) is using in its PCs. DEC also uses SCSI in the VAX 3100 computers. That may be Adaptec too. If anyone is seriously interested, let me know and I'll look up the Adaptec address in my files.
#85712From: Thomas HoladayJan 21, 1990 7:53 PM
If I use Dir, Copy, and so forth, do I refer to the VAX as a logical volume? Is there an extended assign, VaxAssign Foo: DUA2:[someone.else] ?
#85872From: Nick FrabottaJan 22, 1990 8:12 PM
I think Bob meant you use DIR, COPY and so forth from the VAX. The only difference is you must use the "foreign file specification" syntax when naming files: Dir/Size/Date Amiga::"devs:printers/*" (note the quotes) that's all. All assigned Amiga logicals are recognized by the VAX. Programs on the VAX can access the Amiga file system transparently (thru the magic of DECnet). Specific utilities are used to access the VAX from the Amiga since the Amiga-DOS utilities don't recognize node names. There is the need to adding access control (usernames & passwords) to access the VAX.
#85899From: Thomas HoladayJan 22, 1990 10:09 PM
Uhh, Amiga-DOS utilities don't recognize node names, right, so I wouldn't expect to be able to say '1> Copy NEWYRK::DUA1:[TRADERS]Tradelist.txt to df0:TradeList.txt' But, uhh, how about a handler, and a single utility VaxAssign, that would let me aim an Amiga logical to a Vax directory, like this: 1> VaxAssign MyVax: NEWYRK::DUA1:[TRADERS]Tradelist.txt 1> dir MyVax: Then dir invokes the handler for a MyVax: type of file system and gives me a directory? Doesn't Bill Hawes' PathMan do something nifty with handlers in order to join directories into a single logical? Uhh, or couldn't there be a VaxMount command, like the CrossDOS approach, that would Mount NEWYRK:: as a funny kind of disk drive the way CrossDOS mounts df0: as a DOS-or-AmigaDOS disk drive?
#86045From: Nick FrabottaJan 23, 1990 7:21 PM
> Uhh, Amiga-DOS utilities don't recognize node names, right, so I wouldn't > expect to be able to say '1> Copy NEWYRK::DUA1:[TRADERS]Tradelist.txt to > df0:TradeList.txt' No. You'd say 'NetCopy NEWYRK::DUA1:[TRADERS]Tradelist.txt df0:TradeList.txt'. And if you need access control, it's 'NEWYRK/user/pwd::DUA1:…'. Answering your other questions… There certainly could be handlers. And there certainly could be mounted file systems. Both facilities are so underdocumented it's pathetic. Drivers I can do blindfolded. If I've overlooked some magic scripture, feel free to point me in the right direction. Without making promises before their time, some kind of transparent file serving will more than likely be available in the Ethernet version. Uhh, you seem really interested in transparent access. Just what do you need to do?
#86060From: Thomas HoladayJan 23, 1990 9:32 PM
Transparent access (over ethernet) lets you use an Amiga 2000 as a programmer's editor workstation on a VAX. Start up your favorite editor, load the sources from the VAX, modify, save them, compile, repeat.
#86323From: John DraperJan 25, 1990 10:53 AM
Is it common among DEC folks to wonder why someone would want transparently accessed files from a server or peer?
#86352From: Thomas HoladayJan 25, 1990 1:35 PM
Larry, I think it is common among DEC folks to assume that files on a peer or server will be accessed transparently. VMS' Copy, Rename, and so forth work whether I'm dealing with files on my node or on some remote node. VMS has options that permit the system manager to make inter-node access difficult as a security enhancement.
#86358From: John DraperJan 25, 1990 2:18 PM
Interesting… I was wondering, because it seemed like the fellow answering your questions was expressing some surprise that you wished to have tranparent access.
#86405From: RON TROYJan 25, 1990 6:28 PM
Not for me. I love using DECNET in many wierd ways.
#86061From: Thomas HoladayJan 23, 1990 9:33 PM
The slickest transparent access to foreign file systems is done by the guy who wrote CrossDOS. He's friendly enough on the telephone.
#86404From: RON TROYJan 25, 1990 6:28 PM
And what will it cost? And to allow amiga utilities to access VAX or other decnet files would be great, done the way cross-dos does it. I can imagine using your decnet and cross dos with a command like "COPY MYVAX"MYUSERNAME MYPASSWORD"::$1$DUA2:[MYDIR.WRK]ABC.DAT C:DOSDIR\WORK /LOG" from my Amiga, getting a file from a VAX at work (were I still employed) and copying the file to my messydros partition on my Amiga hard drive while using your decnet over my serial port.
#86429From: Nick FrabottaJan 25, 1990 8:48 PM
I haven't priced it yet. [Well, I have, but it's too early to say.] Well, that two comments for "the way Cross-DOS does it". I'll check it out.
#86406From: RON TROYJan 25, 1990 6:29 PM
Will there be a full SET HOST?
#86431From: Nick FrabottaJan 25, 1990 8:49 PM
You will be able to SET HOST to any machine which implements the CTERM protocol. You will be able to initiate multiple sessions to one or more machines.
#86441From: RON TROYJan 25, 1990 9:12 PM
I like the idea that I could dial into a serial port on a VAX at a remote location and establish a DECNET link to that VAX. That leaves me with a new question; whenever I've set host from one VAX to another, I've always been logged into the first VAX using a terminal, perhaps a VT340 or a 220. How will I handle that with this DECnet? Will you include a 100 or 220 or better terminal emulator, or allow some modified version of something like handshake to be used?
#86403From: RON TROYJan 25, 1990 6:28 PM
First, how do you set the Amiga's node name? 2nd, what type of security can you set up? 3rd, how does this product compare to TSSNET? 4th, does it work with the GFXbase Xwindows product? ETC!
#86427From: Nick FrabottaJan 25, 1990 8:47 PM
> how do you set the Amiga's node name? The Amiga will have a node database. This will associate the node name with the node number (among other things). > what type of security can you set up? All incoming and outgoing connect requests have an access control field attached. They contain a username and password, or a proxy account name. The Amiga has the means to check them and reject requests which don't match. The Amiga can setup these fields when originating connections. > how does this product compare to TSSNET? [How come you can never find a TSSnet ad when you need one?] I imagine they're comparable at a 'what do they do?' level. There's a 'basic networking utilities' set which everyone does. > does it work with the GFXbase Xwindows product? I had talked to Dale Luck about it a few months ago. He's since been wisked away to West Chester. > ETC! You're touching on just the questions that I hope will be resolved (soon) by the Amiga Network Working Group. The goal is interoperability, standard network application programming interfaces, and (if I have anything to say about it) a uniform naming convention and access control.
#86439From: RON TROYJan 25, 1990 9:11 PM
It sounds like this will be highly compliant with what I've come to know about DECnet. I'm painfully familiar with node names versus node numbers, of course. It will be interesting, of course, to see how one implements proxies on the Amiga. Actually, to me the biggest difference between AmigaDos and VMS is that the one was designed to be multiuser, and the other was not. I find that in use and in how they work some remarkable similarities. I hope you get back in touch with Dale at CATS; I have stated here on tech that I'd like to see Amiga's set up as trader's workstations with decnet (choice of ethernet or serial depending on location) and x/decwindows, a 68030 for proper performance, 1.4 and its higher resolutions (appropriate chips and monitor), 80386 bridge so the traders can use products like 123, etc. A package like that would do everything now done by MicroVax workstations and more for a lot less money, and could really open things up for Commodore. While I am currently unemployed (and looking very hard in Manhattan), I would be pleased to do anything I could to help you test your new product.
#86658From: SyndesisJan 26, 1990 8:08 PM
It's true, you'll see many similarities between implementations of any given network software. It's reliability and the extras that will make one product shine over the other. The Amiga DECnet from Syndesis Corporation is a licensed port of proven commercial code from the Macintosh and Unix world. In fact, it's being verified and tested on that company's computer networks at this very moment, talking with VAXes, PCs and Macs. In our first release of TSSnet, we'll have virtual terminal capabilities, which means you can use your favorite Amiga terminal program to make connections to the machines you want. GfxBase will soon start shipping the version of X Window that works with our DECnet, over any Ethernet board currently available, and even some that aren't available yet. 🙂 We also work over modems and the serial port, including the higher speeds available with the ASDG Dual Serial board. Syndesis is working very closely with Commodore in many locations around the globe, from techies working on the latest network software, to the developer network working group, to dealers and salespeople who are adding our DECnet to bids for installation in major corporations.
#86715From: RON TROYJan 26, 1990 11:53 PM
Well, understand my selfish viewpoint here; I like seeing at least one, perhaps competing products in something this important. Either way, I'm pleased that Decnet is finally coming to Amiga! And your answer to the terminal question is excellent. Ron
#86659From: SyndesisJan 26, 1990 8:08 PM
For those of you interested in DECnet for the Amiga, if you haven't already, just send Syndesis a postcard, and we'll add you to our TSSnet mailing list. Our address is N9353 Benson Road, Brooklyn, WI 53521, phone (608) 455-1422. The person to contact is Bob Tolly, our Network Product Manager. He'll send you our current TSSnet literature right away. I know a number of people are engaged in conversations with Bob about the features they'd like to see in Amiga TSSnet. I suspect the official beta testing will begin in a week or so. If you'd li-"=DWR,KkW-YY9ed for beta testing, send Bob a letter describing your network and the kind of things you do with it. You might also want to check out the threads in the Syndesis section in the AmigaVendor forum. The TSSnet threads are still there.
#86802From: Steve PietrowiczJan 27, 1990 7:52 AM
OK….I'll add to the list of questions too. 🙂 When and how much?
#85695From: Brian BartlettJan 21, 1990 5:17 PM
I'm impressed too and I wish them success in selling the product. Now, if they can get some other network interfaces out there…. 🙂
#85704From: Robert AlbrechtJan 21, 1990 6:24 PM
What do you mean by other network interfaces? Ethernet boards?
#85713From: Brian BartlettJan 21, 1990 7:58 PM
ethernet, Appletalk, etc. It would be nice to have one company that takes care of us amiga users, as apparently this company does, with respect to DecNet. Just a thought.
#85873From: Nick FrabottaJan 22, 1990 8:13 PM
All I can say, Brian, is that we ARE committed to taking care of us Amiga users with respect to networking, whatever that needs to be.
#85907From: Brian BartlettJan 22, 1990 10:50 PM
I noticed that. Thank you for the information!
#86442From: Robert AlbrechtJan 25, 1990 9:15 PM
I would rather see competition in the Amiga market, it is better for the users for a bunch of developers to be fighting for our dollars. I think if anyone is going to be the "King of The Amiga Networks" I would like to see it be Interworks. I know the type of talent they have and would expect very fine products in the future.
#86542From: Brian BartlettJan 26, 1990 4:39 AM
Contradictory notions in that message "Competition" vs. "Interworks as the 'King of the Networks'" but I can't really say I disagree with either notion. At least from a presence standpoint, Interworks has definitely got my vote, even though I wouldn't know DECNet from a hole in the ground. Nice to see somebody willing to talk to us.