CompuServe Thread

#A3000 specs

6 messages in this thread
#85517From: Rocco PassaretteJan 20, 1990 6:36 PM
I heard from two different people who saw the new A3000 that it has two interesting features. 1) The A3000 has a smaller footprint than the A2000, thus it will take up less space on your desktop. 2) The unit uses a single slot expansion card that has four expansion slots on it. (Like a PS/2 model 30-286) The first slot is all Amiga. Slot two and three are Amiga/IBM bridgecard slots. Slot four is a two bus video slot. I love point one, but reducing the number of slots is crazy. I was all set to upgrade to an A3000 but I already use two IBM slots besides my AT bridgecard (Which covers a second slot with it's daughter board). On the good news side the motherboard can be expanded up to 16mb and a controller is built in so you won't need as many Amiga slots. So what does everyone think about fewer slots? I think it's a big mistake. I hope they come out with a tower version soon with more slots.
#85683From: Brian BartlettJan 21, 1990 5:11 PM
I think it's a major mistake, also. There should be a least 2 more Amiga slots. I don't care about IBM slots since I have no need for that mode, but for those that do need it, they need to put more in. Hmmm…I wonder, they could always release a larger model, sort of a reverse Mac II, IIci approach. If we scream loud enough, maybe they might consider it 🙂
#85734From: Rocco PassaretteJan 21, 1990 9:40 PM
The reason why I put this info on this forum was to get reactions and to see if I was they only one who felt that CBM was making a mistake. Don't get me wrong, I think a scalled down version with 4 slots, a small footprint and a low entry price is a good idea. It's just that with the small version CBM should release at the same time a tower version with more slots. In regards to the IBM slots they serve two purposes. First those who need IBM compatibility need the three free IBM slots they now have in their 2000's for things like a serial port and EGA/VGA graphics. (two things that should have been built into the AT-Bridgeboard) The other slot might be used for memory. The second reason for the IBM slots is for purchasing security. I have nine friends who have bought an Amiga 2000. Four have bridgeboards, five do not. The four who bought the 2000, bought it because they liked it's potential and they could also use lotus 1-2-3 and other IBM programs they use at work on their own little Amiga. The other five people were worried about the Amiga and wavered between a PC clone or an Amiga. They bought the Amiga because it offered a security blanket that if the Amiga didn't pan out they could still turn it into a PC clone. My conclusion is those PC slots are important if we want to see as many machines sold as possible.
#85750From: Steve GrandonaJan 21, 1990 10:53 PM
I agree with you. I have only one Amiga slot left open and room for a half-height card on the PC side now. What I need is more expansion room, not less.
#85823From: Ethan SolomitaJan 22, 1990 2:29 PM
Steve, how many slots would you have free if you didn't need a memory board or SCSI controller? You don't need them on this proposed A3000.
#85797From: Ethan SolomitaJan 22, 1990 9:38 AM
As long as they have a video and a SCSI port built in, its not so bad, at least not for most people. Also there is no need for a memory expansion card as there is 16MB on board. Don't forget: apple no longer makes a full-size Mac IIxxx. I was told they dropped the IIx, with the II dropped quite a while ago. That leaves three slot units. The only thing that concerns me is drive bays. P.S. To add to the rumor spreading, I was told at the NCGA Expo that the A3000 would be shown in Germany at the end of March.