CompuServe Thread

#Registration Problems?

16 messages in this thread
#185352From: Paul IdolFeb 13, 1995 9:21 AM
Since I've been burned and nearly burned a couple times recently trying to register shareware, I figured I'd first ask this time if anyone here has had troubles. I'm about to register: DiskCat by Kenny E. Nagy for US $10 UUxT by Asher Feldman for US $10 VirusChecker by John Veldthius for US $20 I had also planned to register MUI, which I already asked about. Has anyone in the US successfully done so? There are probable some other things I should register too, but that's about as much as I should spend and then some for now. 🙁 Paul (aka Mr. Zombie)
#185359From: Steve AhlstromFeb 13, 1995 11:37 AM
Paul, I registered MUI about 3 months back … but directly with Stefan via email (trade for AP, actually). -sja
#185370From: Paul IdolFeb 13, 1995 12:53 PM
Steve- Hmmm. I don't have any software to trade with, but I guess I'll give it a try via snail mail directly. Thanks. Paul (aka Mr. Zombie)
#185373From: Michael SheaFeb 13, 1995 1:36 PM
> I registered MUI about 3 months back … but directly with Stefan via >email (trade for AP, actually). Are you still thinking of incorporating MUI into a future version of Autopilot? ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#185374From: Steve AhlstromFeb 13, 1995 2:04 PM
Michael, No, I'm not. It would require people to have MUI, whether registered or not. Also, after having used MUI for a few months now, I've come to the conclusion that it is very slow — even on a Warp Engine 4040. While it offers some great visual benefits, I think the negatives outweigh any benefits.
#185392From: Michael SheaFeb 13, 1995 5:19 PM
Well, I am not disappointed that you are not going to use MUI. While I like the program and am trying to figure out the best way to register it, and while I myself might write a program or two using it someday, I think AP has a fine GUI and since you already done all the "overhead" of creating AP GUI, you time might be better spent on other things. While I agree that MUI is a little slow, I consider it quite nice and very usable. It is my hope a way might be found to speed up future versions. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#185400From: Carson TylerFeb 13, 1995 7:43 PM
I registered UUxT just a few weeks ago, no problems whatsoever. Asher Feldman is a gentleman and a scholar as far as I'm concerned, and he'll be delighted to get your shareware fee. CarsonT
#185404From: Paul IdolFeb 13, 1995 8:29 PM
Thanks for the recommendation. I'll register it promptly. Paul (aka Mr. Zombie)
#185693From: Pete DenomyFeb 16, 1995 7:49 PM
Paul, Back in January I registered Virus Checker with John and had no problems. He replied very quickly, considering where he lives. It took about 18 days all told to get a reply. He has a unique way to develop your key file so don't expect a disk, just a letter. He includes a PGP key fingerprint so you can confirm his key file if you have PGP. You will not be disappointed with the capabilities of the registered Virus Checker and it's ability to check LHA files before you decompress them. Pete. / / Flying the A3000 on AutoPilot 1.77 \/\/ from Durham,Ontario.
#185750From: Paul IdolFeb 17, 1995 9:14 AM
Thanks Pete, it's on my list now. Paul (aka Mr. Zombie)
#185753From: Roy PahnkeFeb 17, 1995 10:21 AM
Pete – >>…"He includes a PGP key fingerprint so you can confirm his key file if you have PGP." What is a PGP – I'm stumped on that one. OnLine since 1982 Roy Pahnke – Casper WY
#185782From: daniel stripesFeb 17, 1995 5:46 PM
PGP is an encryption method/program that has been implemented on various platforms. //daniel on \X/ AutoPilot 1.77
#185845From: Jim ButterfieldFeb 18, 1995 8:33 AM
PGP stands for "Pretty Good Privacy", a program written by Philip Zimmerman which uses a PUBLIC KEY. Here's the way it works: anyone may publish a public key of their own devising, so that everyone can see it. But only that individual can code messages that may be read with the public key. (There are really a pair of keys, one secret, one public). So .. a program comes along claiming to be written by X. You're not sure; it might be a fake (this has happened lots of time). Well, X has published a public key (sometimes called a "fingerprint") and sends along an authentication message with the program, encoded in PGP. Now: if you, or anyone else, can decode that message using X's publicly known key, you can be sure that the transmission is genuine and really comes from him. You do not need to decode the message, or to have PGP .. it's just another assurance level is you would like it. —- PGP has been the subject of hot debate for well over a year now. Zimmerman wrote it for general use (and a version for sale), and some versions use patented coding. BUT: agencies of the US Government do not want encryption systems in general use that are too good; they want codes that they can break. For example, they have been pushing the "clipper" chip encryption, which is fairly weak, and have been pressing for key registration of encryption keys with federal authorities. Following this line further, they have banned the export of PGP from the US without special licensing. But, netowrks being what they are, there are already many versions of PGP available on BBSs around the world, and its use for "signature authentication" is widespread. What will happen next in these murky waters? Who knows? I have no doubt that there will be books out about the whole PGP confusion. Are patents being violated? Will the FBI succeed in muzzling private encryption? Can export controls work in worldwide network environments? — Anyhow, you don't *need* PGP. But you can get it and use it if you want. –Jim
#185849From: Roy PahnkeFeb 18, 1995 10:01 AM
Thanks for the explanation Jim: It is an issue I have heard about. The "clipper" end of things is definatly a hot topic. And it's certainly not one that I'm going to get into the middle of. OnLine since 1982 Roy Pahnke – Casper WY
#185878From: Michael SheaFeb 18, 1995 2:00 PM
> Well, X has published a public key (sometimes called a "fingerprint") I don't think this is quite the correct terminology. A public key, in ascii form, looks like —–BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK—– Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAy8GFvAAAAEEAKJk5teKAWl45fKiy/KfAgZCfZ4FTi7S58LLZjzt05OcjFrm F2cuya0qzl1NOF06kZW0d3Yj/ZO9hPpqyomVvzDMZxXCezIh2T1f6s8iZ55nJEzx aflsfUDr8LOzpTHl8murzBfmAvFKHl2+rfNsYarZGhq0p+akKtdQ+YB8kXppAAUR tDdNaWNoYWVsIEUuIFNoZWEgPJswIHabMCB2mzAgdjc2NjY1LDMzNjBAY29tcHVz ZXJ2ZS5jb20+ =z429 —–END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK—– While a fingerprint looks like. Key fingerprint = 8A 68 FC 8C 14 50 73 B4 D3 D6 80 08 97 BC 8C EC While I believe a public will generate a unique fingerprint, I don't believe a fingerprint can be used to derive the public key. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#185958From: Jim ButterfieldFeb 19, 1995 6:29 AM
Thansk for the clarification, Michael. –Jim