This is an archive of CompuServe forum messages from 1985 to 1995, as saved in transcripts by John Foust.
Search Results (7 messages)
Thanks for caring enough to mention it. I sent your first messagew up to the marketing and package design folks. JR
Gee, I'm glad someone *else* feels this way! Thought *I* was the only one that this bothered!!! (Nice patronizing little reply we got, wasn't it?) Unfortunately, Aldus is not the only one who operates in this fashion. Many other software publishers seem to also feel that established customers are worth…
[continued] manually, which is o.k. if the publication is short, but is obviously drudgery for longer documents. Thanks~ John O'Meara Thunder Bay, Ontario
#Headwords suggestion
Message #50527
I have been away for a while, and have not been able to get back to you on my suggestion for a leading/trailing head word feature in PM 4.0. Here is what I have. (I started a new thread, sorry) I am not a programmer, so I don't know how…
JR, About the problem with PM 4 manuals not fitting in old boxes: a lot of people have been steamed about this one, since the upgrade box is so flimsy. I've seen other messages left here about it, some demanding new boxes. I'm not sure how the spotted owls around…
I've passed your request on to our package design folks. Thanks for letting us know, JR Aldus Corp.
#PM4.0 Request
Message #50399
I have a feature request for Pagemaker 4.0. When Aldus send the update, how about in a real box. My Pagemaker 4.0 upgrade will NOT fit the old heavy-duty Pagemaker I have been using for the various upgrades since I made the original purchase. In fact, as I remember, Aldus…