#Info On 1st CDROM Projec
09-Mar-93 14:54:54
Sb: #42157-#Info On 1st CDROM Projec
Fm: Samuel Feldman 70403,432
To: Eric K. Evans 71500,2741
I'm just beginning my first CD project also. I have learned quite a
lot about Microsoft Viewer. The Beta for the version 2.0 of Viewer
just shipped, and I also just got back from a 2-day Microsoft Viewer
class. The way I think of Viewer is as an enhanced version of
Windows Help.
If you look at Windows Help, you'll see that it supports hypertext
quite nicely, as well as some other features such as embedded
graphics, history lists, etc.
Viewer is the same but with more features. The biggest single feature
is the full-text search engine. Viewer also supports more
flexibility in screen layout, and comes with libraries you can call
into for multimedia support.
Like Help, you have to use .RTF format to compile your title, and
there aren't currently any third-party tools that let you compose and
edit in a really interactive WYSIWYG way — with the exception of
tools like RoboHelp (from Blue Sky, with a 2.0 version due out pretty
soon), which are good at composing Help titles, and can also be used
for that subset of Viewer authoring.
I don't know about "Ntergaid". Can you fill us in?
Viewer seems to be best for publishing tasks where there are lots of
pages of text, and you want a fair amount of hypertext among them.
Anything fancy you want to do you'll have to write C code for, since
Viewer doesn't support it directly. However, at least Viewer DOES
support calling out to DLLs, so the hooks are there. For example, in
Cinemania, there is a very nice looking "remote control" device that
appears on screen that the user manipulates to make things happen.
That was implemented in C code outside of Viewer, but Viewer calls it
and it calls into Viewer to manipulate things.
I have also played with ToolBook. I like ToolBook better for
prototyping, since it's all interactive and interpreted (not like
Viewer, which is compiled). But there are enough things that I don't
like about ToolBook that I wouldn't consider it for publishing large
amounts of text.