#2.1 eats processes?
24-Mar-93 01:18:06
Sb: #33341-#2.1 eats processes?
Fm: Miguel Chavez 71573,1521
To: Jim Dutton 72237,561
This same thing had puzzled me for the longest time, but I eventually
found the answer. When your startup script is launching processes willy
nilly, a table of sorts is created which delineates what process loaded in
what order. So if 4 processes are launched consecutively, they are proc.
1, 2, 3, and 4 of course. But, when process 2 ends, the numbers don't
shift over, they simply stay as 1, 3, and 4. If you were to execute
something at this point, it would fill in the space left by the last
process and be called process 2.
For instance, right now my shell has a 5> in it's prompt. When I do a
NewShell, the new shell has a 2>.
Easy, eh?
Miguel ——– AP, AP, and away!