CompuServe Messages

>>I guess this is where we get to tell the story when I almost strangled you at ImageWorld? 🙂 Yes, I know I was getting you pretty upset that day with the starfield glitch. It's just that your answers wern't satisfying me. When I want something really bad I do my best to find everything wrong I can with what I see and that was it. I did the same at the Matrox booth and the Bandit booth. I had similar experiences there too. Later I came home and through use of motion blur I was able to recreate that double starfield defect in my frame by frame system. Consequently, I was convinced it was not the PAR but in how that particular animation was rendered. Accepting donated animations is a double edged sword, you know. Actually, you can check this with GregP. and John Ellis, in your absence during December and January, I think I did quite a bit to dispell much of the trash that was being put out about the PAR like its "terrible jpeg video quality" Some actually accused me of being on your payroll. <G> Your product is doing everything you claim and then some. Other than minor bugs in the software, which we all have learned to expect in this business, everybody seems to be very pleased, and pleasantly surprised at the PAR quality. Keep up your presence here on the forum and try not to strangle any of us when we get rather obnoxious in the interest of solving problems or pointing them out.