#Tech Support <g>'s
17-Mar-94 20:28:03
Sb: #92043-#Tech Support <g>'s
Fm: Gus Grubba 70673,1605
To: albert waltner 70137,2777
Pornography by definition means the study of prostitution. As such, any other
use of the word is suspicious of a hypocritic society. I don't condole nor
condemn the behavior normally attached to this word. I do condemn however, the
idea of people enforcing their religious believes onto others. I can't, for the
life of me, understand what's the difference between exposing your nose and
exposing your penis. They are just parts of your body. This whole idea of
condemnation is a very sick legacy of an autocratic religious state from the
middle ages. It has nothing to do with moral values. It's just hypocrisis plain
and simple. Moral is something more related to geography than to anything else.
For instance, the Saudi Arabia government just issued a decree this last Monday
banning all satellite dishes as they were being used to receive TV programming
that, according with their religious believes, deemed too offensive. It showed
things like couples holding hands and that's considered "pornography". If you
laugh at this notion, why do we still do the same thing? Is it right to enforce
rules onto others based on such abstract reasons? Are the Saudis doing the
right thing? Is it really acceptable to have the government dictating what is
and what isn't "morally" acceptable?
The reason I get upset over these issues is that this is used as precedent over
much more important things. When we turn our backs to reason and just follow
the Jesse Helms of the world, we're in to a big trip downhill.
Gee… here I go again…