CD-vs-CD
I think that the market will be driven by what the kids can convince
their parents to buy for them. Kids see these as game machines, and
that's what they will get excited about. You'll never hear a kid say
anything about a VCR or an Encyclopedia being cool. The additional
capabilities these machines have and the reference and edutainment
titles are more a balm for the parents so they can pat themselves on
the back for getting something that is "Good for little Johnny" You
and I see many additional uses, but they won't be the initial market
– thats kids who want games.
How about "CD Platforms" as an acceptable name?
You're right of course – the "Information Superhighway" is still
vaporware. I was just thinking to myself and my fingers were just
typing along (Mavis Beacon has been very good to me, I can nearly
keep up with my train of thought these days) Any of these machines
will make good set top boxes, provided someone will risk taking the
plunge. They are all probably capable of living up to the hype about
interactive TV.
The CD Magazine would work best for something like "Wired" which is
attempting to implement multimedia in a print format. (Mainstream
Cyberpunk is the impression I get every time I read it, so I tend to
call it the Oxymoron Magazine 😉 Other likely candidates are the
gaming publications, the magazines about multimedia,travel magazines,
and all these low budget low circulation instructional videos like
"Bassfishin' Basics" or "Golf for the Klutz" I personally hope to see
a leader like "US News" (each issue already on line here) take the
plunge and offer a CD version of the magazine. The format is nearly
ideal – short bytes about a lot of topics, and several larger
sections with higher info content. Something like "US News" would me
much more difficult to switch to a CD format, since their whole
operation is geared toward the written word. I'll put my money on
"Wired."
This whole multimedia concept just leaves me cold. Yes it is a useful
tool, but it isn't the paradigm shift that people are crowing about.
To me it is just a logical extension of TV married to computers. The
entertainment value is high, but the information content is low and I
find myself getting bored. Granted, we have barely begun the
"Multimedia Revolution" but I tend to compare it to TV, a fairly
mature medium, and TV has little appeal beyond B5 these days. (Its
looking to be one of the more Machiavellian shows ever on the tube
even if every actor playing a human has all the acting ability of a
two-by-four. The aliens are much more entertaining)