AutoCAD Exam success
23-Mar-94 20:09:24
Sb: #92947-AutoCAD Exam success
Fm: Steven R. Foster 76376,1514
To: Belliott 70402,715
Bill,
<<These questions are being "preserved" for the boarded review and
consideration. Be advised, though, that this data (when fully compiled) will
not be distributed at will by anyone on the Exam Board or by Drake. Autodesk
will likely publicize them when they are confident we're not looking at "trend"
scoring, or special regional characteristics.>>
Shame, Shame, Shame on you Bill!
Sounds to me that you guys don't want to let the public know how the
certification process is fairing (good or bad)? I am often asked professionally
about how the ACE is being accepted. I guess I'll have to tell everyone that I
don't have any ideal of the success of the effort because the historical data
on that is. . . "being "preserved" for the boarded review and consideration. Be
advised, though, that this data (when fully compiled) will not be distributed
at will by anyone on the Exam Board or by Drake." May I quote you as a ACE
board member?
<<currently we're closely monitoring the "awareness" levels of the test and the
currently running tests… the ATC's have had first dibs on being a Drake
Testing Center (the only place people can take the Exams), but there appears to
be wide-spread lethargy or apathy…so the places to take the test aren't as
numerous as projected to this point.>>
Really nice to hear this from a member of the ACE Board. Gee Bill, WHY? This
may tell you that something is just isn't quite right. Does professional CADD
users in industry and the world of work see testing and certification
differently than what Autodesk perceives as the test? I get many negative
comments on the test from individuals that I deal with in industry on the
concept and importance of the ACE. Hopefully you should see the importance and
the reason why I am so curious on the demographic data on the ACE. You comments
reflect the underlying reason why I want to see such information. This data is
VERY important in my area of interest, professional CADD staff development.
I like to step back and take view the whole process of testing and
certification, not just a small chuck of the issue- that results in a myoptic
view of the world. I want to spread the gospel of having qualified personnel in
technical fields (i.e., CADD). Without good RAW data to make judgements on the
subject, there will be little or no progress in this field.
You stated "there appears to be wide-spread lethargy or apathy" about the
places to take the test, especially in the ATC's. Have you noticed something in
how this thread has been going in the forum? Mainly its been you, an
occassional word from Wayne and primarily little ole me! This is the Education
Issues forum. Why hasn't the ATC's jumped in and responded more? I thought I'd
have them all over my case for some of the comments that I made?
Playing devil's advocate can be dangerous in this game (Wayne will atest to
this). Haven't recieved much comments or hate mail on the subject from the rest
of the world on the topic also. So, what's the scoop? Is this a hot topic? YES!
Is it a topic of importance? YES! Then why so cool a response? We may never
know, what a shame! Is the issue of the importance of testing and
certification, the ACE a topic for UNSOLVED MYSTERIES? By then it will be too
late for all concerned. This is TOO important of a topic to let fade! What
should be done to get everyones attention?
Steve