CompuServe Messages

PageSetter

    02-Jan-87 18:15:40
Sb: #46806-PageSetter
Fm: Todd Weiss 76526,1135
To: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321
I believe that the DumpRPort function takes the 980 pixel wide figure only for figuring the maximum dump width. A printout very rarely actually reaches this figure. Instead, the dpi figure is used which is also in printertag.asm. I have noticed that an inch or two is missing from the end of a dump in any case. Anyway, the basic idea is that yes, it is necessary to rewrite the Dump — Sorry … the DumpRPort function … lost my place … hold on a sec … ah, there we are. I'm finally learning FILGE (Fully Impossible Literary Grossout Engine) … as the best solution is to implement a mixture -i.e. since most graphics are more than 1 pixel wide and let's say that it is better to add an anti-aliasing routine which smooth's out the jaggies between pixels. If this were implemented, you would still have the same 1 pixel = 2 dots (sometimes) = 3 dots (sometimes) = 1 dot (somtimes) problem, although it should really be ei (2 or 3) or (1 or 2) but not both — (long weird sentance) — but as jagged pixels would be smoothed out it wouldn't look quite as bad. And with a laser printer (or other hires printer) it would be almost impossible to notice at all, thereby leaving a clean and wonderfully beautiful screendump (now wouldn't that be nice?). Anyway, I'm still interested in any information regarding rewriting the printer.device if anybody happens to have any info available.