#Fluor. Mystery mineral
19-Mar-95 19:28:23
Sb: #174693-#Fluor. Mystery mineral
Fm: Howard Allen 75272,1316
To: Doug Mitchell 70621,702
Hi, Doug–
>> Hydrocarbon inclusions in minerals often fluoresce a bright
yellowish-white…<<
I'm beginning to think this might be the right tree to be barking up. I checked
a couple of entries in Deer, Howie and Zussman, and found the following under
"Montmorillonite Group (smectites)": "Various organic molecules can also be
accomodated in inter-layer spaces…"
The fact that the samples came from within a hydrocarbon-rich shale supports
this theory. I was unable to get any kind of solvent cut from the sample, so if
inter-layer hydrocarbons are indeed the cause of the fluorescence, they must be
pretty well bound into the structure.
>> Calcite and aragonite flouresce bright yellow-white… – any fizz? <<
Nope, no fizz, even on heating in 10% HCl. The only reaction at all was that
the HCl starting taking on a yellowish tinge in cold HCl after about a minute,
which usually indicates iron. Submicroscopic pyrite could account for the
greenish grey colour of the rock.
>> I have one casual indication of a modest white response from kaolinite. <<
Most of the kaolinite I run into doesn't fluoresce at all, at least not in
long-wave.
>> Are we talking radioactive like granite, or radioactive like high-grade
uranium ore here? <<
Radioactive like granite.
>> Can you describe the brightness and precise color in terms of any
"commonplace" (to fluorescent colors) mineral specimens? <<
Sorry, I don't have any reference material to compare it with, not being a
fluorescent mineral collector myself. The colour of the yellow is more green
than orange.
>> I am surprised you use only longwave UV… <<
Longwave UV is the standard for oil-industry use in describing the fluorescence
colour of oil staining and solvent cuts (the API gravity of various oils is
estimated using fluorescence). This is the only application I have for
fluoroscopy, so my longwave "UV box" is all I have.
Since reading your response, I did a few more experiments that shed some more
light on the subject (no pun intended 🙂 Heating chips of the material
produces no noticeable hydrocarbon odor, although a slight H2S odor was noted,
which might be accounted for by pyrite. As well, the fluorescence was
noticeably reduced. Holding the chips in an open flame (alcohol) for a few
seconds causes them to turn darker grey (I don't think due to soot), and
fluorescence is lost completely.
It seems to me that these facts may also point to interlayer hydrocarbons in
smectites. The darker colour and loss of fluorescence could be explained by
oxidation of the interlayer molecules to carbon. The main reason I didn't
initially consider that hydrocarbons were responsible was the fact that the
surrounding organic shale, while distinctly oily, gave a good cut but had no to
very dull brown fluorescence. Perhaps the smectites preferentially adsorb
lighter fraction (condensate/gasoline range) hydrocarbons. Or, perhaps being
structurally integrated into the montmorillonite layers somehow enhances the
fluorescence. I also tried adding water to heated chips, to see if their
swelling properties were enhanced, perhaps by driving off some of the
hydrocarbons, thus making room for water: no swelling was observed. (Heating
smectites too much causes them to lose the ability to adsorb water, but I tried
with samples heated to varying degrees, with no apparent difference.) I guess
another test would be to get some dehydrated bentonite and soak it in
gasoline/varsol/oil and see what the results are.
>> If you want to send me a sample..<<
If you still want a sample, you can E-mail me your address, and I'll send some
down to you to check.
Thanks for the discussion.
Howard.