#Future of DTV?
18-Mar-95 10:16:43
Sb: #3823-#Future of DTV?
Fm: Timothy Liebe 73373,3347
To: Michael W. Towe 74364,1466
Mike:
>Even if your system can make the viewers TV explode, bounce off all four walls
and come back together in the center off the room, it still won't save your
fanny if the content sucks!!!<
That's *always* been the case, I'm afraid–tho the waters have been muddied
thanks to things like MTV, where often style *is* content. (Jeez, I sound like
my old photography teacher!)
I just flashed on all the froofrah that surrounded LOGAN'S RUN w/SF fans when
it came out–folks were SOOOO impressed w/the amount of special effects in it,
and got so annoyed when it was pointed out that the story stank! (Of course, so
did the special effects–but that's another story…) OTOH, one of the reasons
THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL is a classic of the genre is because it has a
strong story and well-written characters–even though the special effects are
pretty minimal.
>One of the biggest problems I see with programs cut on one of the new wizbang
DTV systems is the over use of DVE's. I think the Toaster guys had a great term
for it, they called it BURNT TOAST :-)))<
ROFL! I LIKE it!!! I recently saw a tape my boss had done for him by an outside
director/editor, where EVERY transition was done w/some fancy Toaster wipe. I
guess it's the 90s answer to "slo-mo mania"–remember in the 70s, where
EVERYBODY was using slow-motion for any action shot (cf., James Glickenhaus)?
It got to the point where I swore I'd never use slow motion in anything I
did…