CompuServe Messages

Lattice vs. Manx

    30-Apr-90 13:32:35
Sb: #100820-Lattice vs. Manx
Fm: Syndesis 76004,1763
To: Vic Wagner 76046,3004
On the other hand, Lattice one-sidedly expanded the "standard object format" at one stage in the game of catch-up, by adding new hunk types and extra debugging information. These additions weren't backwards compatible to other utilities that manipulated object files, so I don't see why you're nominating Lattice for sainthood. "All those developers who had to provide modules in two formats"? How many people does that really affect? After all, both C compiler companies have done many, many things to make their system more proprietary and less portable, in order to lock their users into a particular compiler. And couldn't Manx 3.6 load and link regular Amiga object modules, but it couldn't create them?