ARexx msgs. via DNet
04-Apr-92 16:45:23
Sb: #22167-ARexx msgs. via DNet
Fm: Dale D. Snell 74756,666
To: Christopher Laprise 70431,2172
First, my apologies for not replying to your e-plex; ye olde flu
bug had me down for a few days. I'll merge the the relevant archives
into one, and upload it here as soon as I can.
"From what experience I've had w/Dillon-ware so far, I'm sure there
are LOTS of small details that could get in the way me accomplishing
what I would like to if even the tiniest little piece is omitted."
Heh, yeah, you're right. 🙂 Still, once you get it going,
DNet is great! I've had multiple shell windows going, along with an
up- and down-load running, all simultaneously. At 2400 bps, the
response time is pretty slow, and painting the screen is pretty
jerky, but it *does* work. I find that reading Usenet News is okay
with everything running like that, but trying to edit a file is — ah
-painful. Deathly slow, is more like it. However, without the file
transfers, editing works pretty well, even at 2400 bps, and multiple
shells are no trouble at all. (I'm on pins and needles waiting for
my v.32bis modem to arrive. *That* ought to take care of the packet
delays!)
The parts that people seem to have trouble with are getting the
dnet.servers files correct, getting the parity and protocol handling
settings correct, and getting the Unix end of the program to compile.
DNet only compiles under BSD, or a close clone (e.g., SunOS). I
don't know of anybody who's gotten it to compile and run under any
flavor of System V. (If anybody out there has done so, *PLEASE* let
me know!)
BTW, v2.13 isn't really defunct. In fact, the 2.13 Amiga
binaries are what I'm running right now. Matt pulled some boners
when he assembled the v2.20 archive, and he got the wrong binaries
installed for the Amiga side. It's been working well enough for me
that I've not been motivated to try and re-compile them.
Oh well, I've rambled on enough. Time to Whap! the Forums and
Libraries…