#how are we doing?
29-Apr-92 03:27:29
Sb: #22990-#how are we doing?
Fm: Jim Ogilvie 72657,3437
To: Michael Gerard 75505,1757
Bushwah! 🙂
Magazines that report 'what's available' in any given arena have a
responsibility to cover all the reasonable bases.
If any major Amiga mag were doing an article on telecommunications, to
not mention Backtalk, Access, Term and others in the same breath as
BaudBandit and other *commercial* programs, would be a crime.
Not only a crime, but it would be a total waste of time. To exclude
PD software simply based on the idea that it would be biting the hand
that feeds them is ludicrous. The hand that feeds the magazine
publishers in large part, is the hand of the reader. Therefore, the
reader being the customer, should get the best service possible. To
exclude PD software that is clearly the best or one of the best
solutions available for any given application is simply negligence.
I'm not suggesting that when a new product comes out (say, xyz paint
program) that a complete listing of PD equivalents be included with
the review. I am speaking mainly of when magazines decide to showcase
or feature a specific area of application, and then fail to mention
PD or Shareware contenders.