#ProPage User Question
03-Apr-93 02:02:40
Sb: #93706-#ProPage User Question
Fm: Nancy Devitt 73157,3606
To: Soft-Logik Tech Support 76004,1676
This message is also to Roger Hand, and a few others interested in
PC-based desktop publishing.
A few weeks ago, I bought MICROSOFT PUBLISHER, mainly because "Windows
User" ranked it first among ALL available desktop publishing programs
available for the PC. This is a joke. MSP is more like a super-smooth
PRINTSHOP. Granted – it does allow you to produce a VERY limited number of
good-looking projects in a flash. It utilizes Page Wizards – exactly like
PPage Page Genies – as well as templates. The company also markets a
template package, which I bought. A SUPER collection of clip art is
included.
But – the program is extremely unstable (and this is not a factor of
memory); many of the templates contain text which cannot be edited without
the formatting breaking up, and revising the templates and the genies is a
pain.
Today, I had quite a long conversation with one of the developers of
Quark, and he was amazed to learn that I did most of my publishing on the
Amiga. He was more than amazed when I told him about the feature I find
most valuable – the virtual page. I've used this feature for a long time
– formerly with the assistance of a public domain utility. The essence of
this concept is that, by defining the appropriate screen size in
Preferences, I can create screens for PageStream or Professional Page
large enough to utilize a single- or double-page spread in its entirely.
My 16-inch monitor is merely a generous-sized window onto this screen,
and, using another handy utility (Pop-up-Menu), I can zip around at top
speed – composing and filling with nary an unnecessary screen refresh. I
can put a page together at least twice as fast as any of my PC-owning
friends, including my son, who publishes a magazine (Earth News) out of LA
using PageMaker.
It has long been beyond me as to why C= hasn't capitalized on the Amiga as
a DTP machine, and why both Gold Disk and PageStream sort of hang their
heads apologetically at the mention of Big Q. One of the features the
fellow at Quark pointed out to me so proudly was their use of diagonal
text boxes! Now, I was nicely polite. This was, after all, a cordial
conversation and I WAS ordering a demo copy of his program. I LOVE to see
PP and PStr developing, and I particularly love to see more and more
import modules – because it means less work for me converting text and
graphics.
If there were decent word processors available for the Amiga, and, if some
enterprising fellow (Ben, are you lurking) developed a HI-JAAK-type
program for the Amiga, I think a lot more people would consider the Amiga
for DTP. This latter shouldn't be too difficult – most of the necessary
code is floating around here and there in the public domain. As for word
processors, developers just have to get their heads out of the sand.
I fully expect here to get the usual flurry of blasts defending Amiga word
processors. The truth is, that all available programs, except for Amiga
WP, are lightweight – not even up to academic thesis preparation. Fonts
and clip art do not a word processor make.
As for Amiga magazines – we need more DTP coverage. The current series in
"Amazing" is an embarrassment: how to make an ugly business card
containing misspelled words, using PageStream, in about triple the steps
such a process would normally take – completely ignoring all PageStream's
and "Radical Type's" resources in that area.
But then, there's always Radical Type – an outstanding resource. (A good
thing, because it's the ONLY resource.)
Sorry for the ranting and raving. It's Friday – and there just may be a
full moon outside…..Nancy