CompuServe Messages

Graham: Thanks for your points. Here's some response: 1) We have seen perhaps three models for generating software. First, the typical Apple/IBM model, where the hardware vendor encourages independent software developers. Second, the Philips/CD-I model where the hardware vendor tries to own virtually all strategic software development. Third, the Nintendo/Sega model where software develoers remain independent, but are totally dependent on the hardwae vendor for access to the market. 3DO seems to be working on an amalgam of these models. 2) CD-I will survive as long as Jan Timmer (chairman of Philips) feels comfortable throwing money at it. Once it is dependent solely on consumer support, it is gone. 3) CDTV seems to have suffered because it was subject to control by Commodore's unique (ahem!) management style. That which survives of the concept appears to be the result of a few dedicated evangelists in Europe who have peeled off its best ideas in a new configuration. 4) A real test of 3DO's viability might be a peek at projects/products (not the dollars) its heavyweight partners are putting behind the system. If AT&T, Matsushita, Time/Warner and Electronic Arts are developing products that support, or are supported by, 3DO, thenthey have a real commitment to it. The fact they may throw a few million $$ into it is insignificant – they blow their nose on that kind of money. The crucial measure is the role 3DO plays in their business plans. Offered for your consideration, Rich Bowers