#INTERNET vs C-Serve
This very aspect of CIS — namely, that messages "scroll off" after a set
amount of time and/or sufficient subsequent message traffic — that IMO makes
CIS not as suitable for a technical support forum such as this one as it would
otherwise be.
GEnie demonstrates a viable alternative: messages there do NOT scroll off
automatically, by time or by message count. (A Topic will _close_
automatically if the message count therein reaches 999, but that only prevents
new messages from being posted until the Topic is cleaned so that the total
message count is less than 999.) Sysops have to manually delete the older
messages and clean the Topic. Usually, they archive messages that are of
moderate or greater interest level first, placing the archive in the Library.
This method has many advantages and few disadvantages. The primary
disadvantage is that it's more work for the Sysops — but then, that's why they
get paid and we pay. <grin> Seriously, any business would benefit from the
policy of "if it's a choice between easier for us vs. easier for our customers,
then we choose easier for our customers even if it means more work for us."
(That's why GUIs are so popular — they're much harder to program, but easier
for the end-users to use.)
The advantages are numerous: because the Sysops can pick and choose which
messages to delete in order to make more room, really important messages that
provide long-term help for frequently-asked questions can be left in even after
a cleaning. Eventually, the "meat" to "gristle" ratio of the Topics increase
to near-100%. Likewise, they can choose what does or does not get archived.
Messages like "Thanks for the answer! Did I ever tell you about the time I met
President Bush? It was on a hot and humid summer day . . ." would just not get
archived.
Because important messages remain, the actual space used by the message
board is less, because the same long answers to the same questions don't have
to be answered over and over and OVER and over again and again and AGAIN and
again every time someone new finds this place, or someone who's not so new
happens to ask a question which he or she hasn't had to ask before, but which
has been answered before. So, for instance, if someone asks, "I just got OS/2
2.1 and can't get 3DSr3 to network render under it using LANtastic 5!" (our own
actual question a few weeks ago!), rather than post the same answer repeatedly
(taking up lots of space and wasting online time for people who use CIM etc.),
one could simply reply something like this: "That has already been answered in
Category 12, Topic 31, Message 193. To read it, `SETcat 12' and then `REAd 31
193'." Much easier and much more efficient.
The scrolling off of messages is an annoyance for something like, say, a
comic book fandom forum, where business do not succeed or fail based on the
timely availability of the information. For something like this, the only
on-line technical support for a $3,000 program that businesses depend on for
their continued existence, "annoyance" is a vast understatement. In our own
case, we posted an important question a couple of months back, and then an
ice-storm ravaged our area, knocking out both electrical and phone lines to our
offices for a total of six days. By the time we were able to access Compuserve
again, both our question and any answers to it had long since met the Saint
Peter of the ASCII Afterlife, much to our chagrin. Had this forum been on
GEnie, the messages would have still been there.
I recommend that CompuServe either change the way it handles message
overflow, or AutoDesk consider opening a branch of this forum on GEnie. We've
invested way too much in 3DS and other Autodesk products to have to deal with
evaporating messages in the sole technical support facility available to us
(short of paying the price of the program again for the honored privilege of
calling Autodesk on the phone).