CompuServe Messages

I don't know what to tell you about that strange effect. I tried to simulate it and with all possible features enabled I did not see an appreciable slow down in pointer positioning. Any program that always runs, though in the background, can slow up the pointer. Perhaps you were running other programs too and the additional strain caused by RSLClock was just too much for the OS to keep up with without the tell tale signs that you noticed. If this had been noticeable I would have set it at a lower task priority than the one that I chosed. Try running RSLClock 1.31 alone and tell me if you find the effect disag disagreeable! -RSL-