#RSLClock 1.3
26-Jan-87 18:31:57
Sb: #50738-#RSLClock 1.3
Fm: Roy S. Laufer 72435,1025
To: Khalid Aldoseri 75166,2531
It may be memory expansion. I still am only using 512K, and have no way
of testing that possibility. I'm interested if this is the cause, and if the
type of expansion memory makes a different. I wonder if anyone else out here
has noticed a perceptible slow down using RSLClock 1.3?
-RSL-