CompuServe Messages

Multi-tasking Computers

#: 124217 S13/Off the CuffForum unknown
    13-May-88 19:57:50
Fm: James Jones 76257,562
To: Kevin Darling 76703,4227

This message turned up in search, but its forum couldn’t be identified from the original transcript, so it may not be linked into its thread.

Well…unless you mess with the MinPty or MaxAge (which are OS-9/68000 knobs, not existing in OS-9/6809), the difference is that all the processes (that aren't asleep waiting for I/O or of their own volition) will get *some* of the CPU time, rather than none. If they're of lower priority, they get less of it than higher priority processes, of course. (MinPty and MaxAge? No process with priority < MinPty gets CPU time until all processes with priority >= MinPty are sleeping; no process priority gets to age above MaxAge. Process priorities are aged when they don't get to execute, so that the scheduling is fair.)