EXPENSIVE 3D
20-May-92 16:03:13
Sb: #15528-EXPENSIVE 3D
Fm: MARTIN G FOSTER 70303,456
To: john c orzechowski 71431,1701
John,
If you want basic images/animation, 3d Studio may not be for you. It
is a BROADCAST quality, highly optimized 3d modelling and animation
package, which is meant to produce high-quality animation, in a timely
manner. You may be able to find ray-tracers even FREE which you might think
produce better still images but that's not what 3d studio is about. I use
3ds professionally in my own animation business and don't think anything
comes close except for maybe 5 times MORE money (Wavefront, Softimage,
Alias etc) and they are much harder to use, and don't even run on Dos based
systems. As a side benefit you can produce vga animations with 3ds but if
you were just doing that then you'd probably be better looking at retail 2d
animation packages or low cost 3d packages. I challenge you to do a 32-bit
3D 2000 frame animation at broadcast resolution (756×486) with field
rendering of, say, a flyby and flythrough of an office complex in less than
a day. I could do this on my 486/33 and then go out to broadcast-quality,
frame-accurate vtr in any format and control it within 3ds. Can you do that
with your Amiga? Do you even want that kind of feature?
My point is that 3d studio sounds like it offers a lot of features that you
don't need, so why pay for them? I suggest you download the feature list of
3ds 2.0 or contact a dealer in order to find out what 3d studio offers you.
Martin
PS: Sorry if I sound terse, but you sound rather critical rather than
inquiring.