VOTE ON OED PRICE HERE!
06-Jan-93 06:26:01
Sb: #35815-VOTE ON OED PRICE HERE!
Fm: Richard Day 70521,2167
To: John Francis 71600,300
I agree the reduced-type/standard-type OED versions are essentially the
same where functionality is concerned. As for the markets – yes, OUP did a
nice job of establishing a second market with the reduced-type version,
especially the book club sales.
>> with the experience of selling the … OED1 at a much higher price, they
have obviously some objective basis for their idea … <<
My feeling is, this is just the point where they're going astray – the
OED1, like the "full size" print version, sold mostly to the library and
institutional markets – quite a few colleges, for instance, have it mounted
on systems accessible by students. Without spending a couple of hours with
my calculator, I'd hazard a guess that the price differential between the
full size print version and the OED2 ROM is mostly a reflection of costs.
I'd further guess that OUP sees the traditional markets for the full-size
print version as being the same markets it will sell most of the ROM
version into, with both yielding similar per-unit revenue.
For better or for worse, OUP is handling a product with mass-market
potential as a specialty item: high unit pricing, relatively narrow
distribution, minimal publicity. In this approach, production costs, as you
say, "may not be entirely irrelevant" – I imagine they are quite relevant,
because of the number of units they need to be spread across.
I'm sure OUP is happy with the way they're handling the product; as a
consumer who will reluctantly pay the ticket, I'm not. As an ex-publisher
(21 years as a director of a major, multinational magazine and book
publisher), I would handle the CD-ROM quite differently, and would be
pretty confident of producing a much better bottom-line yield than the
current price/sales strategy will do.
You're right, I certainly did not mean to imply that "what the market will
bear" considerations no longer apply in the electronics era. It is true
they still apply; it is equally true they are a dangerous way to run a
business – profitable short term, risky in the long haul. Ric