"Save 80% on render"?
06-May-93 11:08:13
Sb: #42913-"Save 80% on render"?
Fm: ALAN IGLESIAS 70262,1240
To: Martin Kunert 71726,2050
Martin,
I rather agree with Gus' assessment of the many differences between video and
film and their "look and feel". Film is actually made of layers of _emulsion_,
which is an organic substance that holds the silver nitrate grains that react
to the light during exposure. I get the feeling that a large part of what we
consider "film quality" comes from the way these grains are suspended in the
emulsion, and then react to the light while filming. (Not to mention all the
different resolutions, timings, color temps, etc.) This may sound a little
simplistic, but I would love to see the result of, instead of recording to
video tape, burning each frame of an animation to a film recorder at
approximately video resolution. The apparent detail would be the same as VTR
recording but may aquire the characteristics of film that we may, at some
times, be looking for. In Babylon 5, there was a bit of a dicontinuity when
they cut to video effects from filmed live action that you don't notice in,
say, Star Trek, although I have read that many of thier effects originate on
video. Maybe this technique could be used to better integrate desktop 3D
animation with network-level television?
Just some thoughts…
-Alan Iglesias