#Ethics vs. Sex on CDROMs
18-May-93 17:03:02
Sb: #48524-#Ethics vs. Sex on CDROMs
Fm: Rich Bowers/OPA 71333,1114
To: JAN SCHWENK 70053,1702
Jan:
I was away for a long day of travelling/airplane/fiascos, so I apologize for
the delay in my response. I agree with Nick, I can't believe this could cause
you any problem at all. At minimum, it appears the publisher called _himself_
a porn dealer, not the reviewer!
While the dirty pictures might be disturbing, I'm most concerned about the
"Trojan Horse" business. Is there any kind of legitimate reason for
distributing this kind of thing? It scrambles the FAT? Is this something that
pc users like to do of a Saturday evening (you crazy kids 'ya-!)?
Are these types of things commonly available on shareware disc? If so, how are
they announced/billboarded usually? I would think it bad policy to distribute
anything of this nature because it can have no real purpose other than cause
damage. This kind of thing deserves to be regulated, just as ATF regulates
those who can sell dynamite or nitro. (Well, if you can make an analogy of
bubonic plague on hamburgers…!).
I have thought for sometime about developing a CDROM publishers code of ethics
to which the industry could contribute and subscribe. It would seem to me that
delivering a harmful program would float to the top of such a list.
Tell me more! – Best – Rich