#CPU Test Pentium vs. All
03-May-94 13:16:29
Sb: #98981-#CPU Test Pentium vs. All
Fm: EDA Ltd 100142,1323
To: DONALD NEWLANDS 73170,3216
PENTIUM P90
I'm just doing some benchtests with AutoCAD R12 C2 for DOS on a Pentium P90 PC
and getting
some interesting results – it proved no faster at running AutoCAD than a
Pentium 60MHz! The
basic config included:
16 MB RAM, Diamond Viper (using a fast asynchronusVL bus), 256Kb cache,
AMIBIOS,
SoftEngine (V2).
Special attention was given to the BIOS settings i.e write back enabled and the
config files were
optimised to run AutoCAD for DOS. The test was run on an identically configured
P60 which
tested at 53 seconds. The best we could get the P90 to do was 51.9 seconds?
I then tried a Diamond Stealth card with Panacea's DLD and got similar
results……….
All those Winbench etc things told us that it was really fast at running
Windows etc but when it
came down to running a real application like AutoCAD there seemed to be a log
jam somewhere
in the system.
Next I tried 3D Studio: The P60 was literally twice as fast as the 486 66 but
the same Pentium
P90 could only give a 20% improvment on the P60.
There are only a few explainations that I can think of:
1) The log jam is now on the video bus – today's processors are fast but the
graphics cards are
now holding back AutoCAD. There was a time when PC processors were not that hot
so graphics
guys decided to off-load some of the processing workload onto another
chip…usually on the
graphics card….maybe this has changed and the CPU is now so fast that the
processor on the
graphics chip is a liability. I have yet to try out a 64 bit card but the
AutoCAD drivers for these
are still a bit ropey..I'll have to wait untill Softengine is up and running
for the Matrox.
2) It's early days and P90 motherboards are not that good – this could be in
the BIOS, general
PCB architecture or chipsets……
The company who's machine I tested know their stuff and have produced some of
the fastest
486s I have seen. So it came as a surpprise to both them and myself as to the
poor P90
performance……. If this is what a good PC manufacturer can come up with what
the hell are the
bad ones going to produce?
On my first encounter I would have to say WAIT until things settle down.
Has anyone else out there looked at any other P90 machines? I would be
interested in any
feedback on Pentiums with AutoCAD.
I'm going to be looking at a VIP Pentium board later this week – that's a
motherboard which has
PCI, VL local bus and ISA slots with the latest OPTI chipset. This may provide
the P90 with its
missing power. Who knows!
Martyn Day, Editor, CADdesk Magazine, London.