#RSLClock1.31
27-Jan-87 18:23:15
Sb: #51112-#RSLClock1.31
Fm: Richard Rae/SYSOP 76703,4253
To: Roy S. Laufer 72435,1025
Hehe… 1.33… let me think about it. 8)
What did you do to 1.32 to avoid patching… did you just run the priority
down? (And if so, how far?) If so, I think I'll wait for all the great
enhancements coming in 1.33… my file is already patched, and I can live
without the left shifted "Time:" label.
Out of curiosity, did you notice the problem at all on your system? About half
the people I've talked to have, the others don't know what I'm talking about.
Was the high priority (20) to insure you could get another CLI when you wanted
it? Doesn't seem to be a need for such a high setting otherwise.
OH… you want a suggestions for 1.33? How about an alarm function? (Well, you
asked! 8) Then, of course, when you get everything just the way you want it,
you can rewrite it in assembly language so it will only take 42 bytes. 😉
Nybbles!