#'non-standard' computers
29-Apr-95 02:08:58
Sb: #194992-#'non-standard' computers
Fm: Robert Comer 72446,656
To: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321
" You seem to keep forgetting the word "desktop" UNIX isn't a desktop OS
unless you're talking engineering workstations. Typical business apps don't
need UNIX."
There's a fine line between "desktops" and "workstations" now, they getting
fairly close. (We had a "desktop" that outperformed our "workstation" by a
good margin.)
"OS/2 is DOA at *most* large companies."
I think your wrong on that. I know of several that were OS2 to begin with, and
stayed, and I know of some that converted to OS/2 in the last 2 months.
" As a matter of fact, I saw an interesting quote in PC Week (or Info World) a
few weeks ago (and nothing to dispute it in later editions)."
Those two mags are pure Windows pablum, and I don't trust what either says.
"IBM has stated they will NOT make another Intel version of OS/2. Warp and the
NetWork Edition are it. "
This was publiched in Infoworld, as well as, a euro mag. IBM responded to that
article, you just probably didn't see the response. I read it in a couple of
different places, but I didn't save the text.
btw, the source that the euro mag quoted was a person closely connected with
MS. I wish I wouldn't have pruned my AP log 2 days ago. 🙁
I know personally, of at least 3 different versions based on this "level" of
code, and I know they are working on another "level" (Warp 4.0)
"Here in Denver (only 125 miles South of you)."
Actually, it's only 99 miles, but who's counting. 🙂
"It has very little corporate penetration."
Check the banks. 🙂
"Talking to places like CompUSA (their government sales office, not their
retail operation)…they sell next to no OS/2."
Have they tried? (No)
Bob Comer — Cheyenne, WY USA
Team OS/2