CompuServe Messages

#I would think

    26-Apr-95 20:32:20
Sb: #I would think
Fm: Alex Baker 75606,563
To: Paul Idol 76375,1776
Right you are…. I've owned an Amiga since early 86. I've owned PC's since 84, and a Mac since 91. People scream when a developer moves to "the other platform". Whether they broke into the market with the Mac, the Amiga, or whatever, people seem to feel that the developers "owe" the platform. Wonder how many folks here over the age of 25 still work for their original employer… If the job didn't get phased out, or the company didn't go out of business, then they essentially left the job for the same reason that most developers do, a greener pasture. The only way to attract and keep developers with the Amiga, is to make it worth their while. Sure they might be able to make a profit, but do any of us really want to work for minimum wage? I don't have easy answers, but I would think that plenty of good tech support from ESCOM/Amiga would be one inducement. If you have good tech support, then it will make it easier to develop a product. With less invested in developing product, then it makes it more enticing to produce for a smaller volume market. One thing that still bothers me, is Lattice having withdrawn support for Amiga C. They do still sell copies of the product, however they no longer develop nor provide tech support for the produce. Lattic C, is _THE_ development platform for the Amiga. To attract new developers, means that we will have to get people to buy and use a product that no longer has technical support. Personally, unless Lattice reverses their position, or there becomes a professional level alternative prodct available, I'd sure hesitate to jump into the Amiga development arena, were I an outsider.