3D Exchange Standard
06-May-95 04:02:59
Sb: #11423-3D Exchange Standard
Fm: Tim Wilson [Crestline] 76432,1122
To: Syndesis 76004,1763
John,
Since there is no serious discussion that I'm aware of by the major
players in the 3D market for extending the DXF format, I had put my focus on
the newer formats. Perhaps you're onto something here though. A new DXF format
might be possible to promote on a grassroots level, but it would take a lot of
work to twist all the 3D devs arms into supporting it.
Again, I come back to my main concern. That is, the ability to link
different 3D apps, or at least generate files with greater mobility from things
like 3D Paint programs, Spline modelers, Metaball modelers, Procedural
Animation programs etc., so devs of these apps can make their products
standalone rather than plug-ins, and usable by a broader base. Would an
enhanced DXF or OBJ be more suited to this job than some of the new-fangled API
formats?
Based on what I've heard lately, by next year we'll end up with a
couple of popular enhanced formats: VRML, 3D Metafile, and something from
Microsoft; and perhaps some revised object formats: DXF, OBJ, RIB (and 3DS?). I
doubt that OpenGL and Keystone will make it into the mainstream, and I don't
fully understand where OpenInventor will fit into this scheme.
-Tim