#I like the Amiga
14-May-95 23:35:37
Sb: #196847-#I like the Amiga
Fm: Christian de la Poi 76173,3214
To: Bart Van Bockstaele 100574,2352
Well, I think it is beneficial to first identify the real strengths of
our beloved computer:
– tight and speedy multitasking 32 bit OS kernel.
– programmable command prompt and built-in scripting language (AREXX).
– support for modern object manipulation and services such as long file names,
etc.
– tighlty integrated custom multi-media chips (NTSC video out, animation and
audio hardware, speedy and auto-configurable 32 bit bus).
– globally supported client multi-media data file format: IFF.
– extensive, programmable and live-switching video modes serviced at the OS
level.
Now for the bad news:
– Appalling name brand recognition.
– Archaic user interface. The Workbench is ridiculous by modern standards:
uneven object support, lack of ordinary peripheral services such as print
spooler and other system events, unfriendly system configuration utilities…
– Unacceptable STANDARD screen refresh rates. This one really kills the
machine. I find it embarrassing to show a static Amiga screen next to that of
an ordinary 486 or Pentium PC with 2MB VRAM PCI graphics accelerator.
– Lack of OS memory protection. Any one app can bring the whole thing down to
its knees. Windows has the same problem, although the Amiga is in a worse
position, since there are proportionately many more misbehaved apps. The sad
thing here, is that it's almost a given to guru frequently. Don't argue this
point. Please. Let's be honest, OK?
– Unfair but real lack of hardware and software vendor support. Say, I really
like that new printer, dear manufacturer. Do you have an Amiga driver for it?
The number one thing to work on, before releasing anything new, is on
PERCEPTION. That starts with high refresh rate screens and a smoothed-out
Workbench. The LCD (Lowest Common Denominator) must be set high from the get
go. The reason the Amiga got a foot in the door in the first place was because
it offered more and in some ways much better for the money at the time (up to
1992). Although it could possibly succeed at a premium price level, this would
have to be accompanied by flawless customer solutions in niche areas such as
video or kiosks, for instance. I don't believe Escom has the expertise or the
resources to compete with the likes of Silicon Graphics at this point. So that
leaves more features and capabilities for less money. And I mean F-A-S-T. The
window of last opportunity is closing right now, if not already so!