#OS comparisons
19-May-95 23:15:05
Sb: #197474-#OS comparisons
Fm: Robert Comer 72446,656
To: Tab Trepagnier 74601,3214
"1. You missed or forgot an earlier message where I said that my company is
already a Windows shop. We have very little OS/2 and are phasing that out. So,
for work purposes, even if IBM sells zillions of copies of OS/2 (*** and I hope
they do ***), it wouldn't be relevant to me."
I was mainly just reacting to your condemnation of OS/2 in general, rather than
you specifically. Your basing your OS/2 opinions on just your company, and
there are others out there. Our company is doing the opposite, we're phasing
out Windows and going to OS/2.
I wouldn't have bothered post if you hadn't said that OS/2 was dead. 🙂
" The IBM personnel I talk to cannot give any vision of why I should bother
with OS/2 other than it's theirs and it will keep a couple hundred bucks out of
Bill Gates' pocket (a laudible goal)."
Then you obviously have bad salesmen, or you weren't really listening to them.
I have plenty of reasons to use OS/2, if you want to hear them, I'll be happy
to tell.
"And I doubt their long-term committment to it."
That's what a lot of people say, but I can assure you, it's far to important a
product for IBM to let it slide.
"From where I sit, there is too much of "a little too little, a little too
late" to OS/2."
I could say the very same thing about NT.
Bob Comer — Cheyenne, WY USA
Team OS/2