#Future of DTV?
03-Apr-95 13:51:04
Sb: #4290-#Future of DTV?
Fm: Paul Vendrick 76270,3621
To: Timothy Liebe 73373,3347
<<if you have to do that, you're not telling your story effectively>> <–
refering to: "there are times when you just have stop the film, tap on the
screen and ask, "are you getting this?">>
Oh, of course, Tim. The 'are you getting this' moniker is one I ascribed to
that icky part of so much (even professional) work these days where characters
have on-screen conversations about topics which everyone (including the viewer)
knows are obvious to people in the movie. So unnatural, and unfortunately my
video is riddled with it. But I'm far from alone.
For example, I saw 'Tank Girl' this weekend. The director went to some
considerable trouble to execute nice matte 'establishing shots'; dramatic
vistas of a world where fresh water suddenly dried up decades ago. A little
film schoolish in style, but convincing. Then comes the 'tap on the screen';
characters going on and on about how there's no water and how precious it is.
Oh, please. '… these are the white keys and these are the black ones.'
Obviating enumerationist, indeed. <g>
<<speak to one person, NOT to a crowd…if the idea is clearly presented,
*everyone* will feel you're speaking just to him or her.>>
An excellent tip. And something probably even more important when editing. We
tend to think of editing as 'cutting out the bad stuff'. The painful part is
when footage is really, really, good yet totally unnecessary. Editing is
indeed 90% tailoring and 10% 'fixing and correcting'.
<<do you insert it *deliberately* or does it just come out in *how* you do
it?>>
I realize it may be heavy-handed, but I often force it. If I don't, my video
comes off sterilized, journalistic and dispassionate. Ordinary. There is
nothing wrong with telling the facts, but when making personal video, why do
that? I learned in creative writing studies that the *only* thing I have that
you don't have is my point of view (unless I have exclusive facts; but if I
waited until I shot the Rodney King beating I'd never make video). And whether
you're Rice or Mitchener, that's what everyone who reads you is interested in.
Your point. Otherwise, viewers might as well be watching the news.
So, no. I don't assume that just because I have a point of view that it's
clear when translated to tape.
<<I'm not a sitcom fan–I feel they're SOOO determined to "sell" the moral,
rather than letting the moral come out of the story itself>>
Me neither. I watch them for educational purposes (sounds funny, doesn't it),
but one can quickly gag when spoonfed a moral; metered out from title to
credits. Yuk.
Paul