AG-455U, L2 or VX-3?
05-Apr-95 15:17:33
Sb: #4407-AG-455U, L2 or VX-3?
Fm: John Small 72550,2150
To: David McElroy 75450,3334
> Since the L2 is more expensive than the VX-3, I wonder what features are
> missing in the VX-3 to make it less expensive and still have three chips
> rather than the one-chip of the L2.
I considered these briefly and then bought the Sony TR-700 Hi8. The
L2 has interchangeable lenses and one, a very expensive one at that,
has optical stabilization. The VX-3 does not have stabilization.
Here others have said that Canon's license with Sony prohibits them
from making a 3 CCD L2. This would be optimal imho. I've read
generally good remarks about all three. For the Hi8 camp the VX-3 in
the low cost or the EVW-300 (same full size as 455U with 3 CCD Hi8
format) for the serious pro are the ones from what I can tell. The
major flack about Hi8 drop outs seems to be resolved with Fuji's
newer 120ME evaporated tape. The 60 and 120 are from the same tape
stock.
The 455U gets good marks but there are a couple of limitations (that I
don't recall … sorry). It with a couple of Panasonic 1970 SVHS
decks seem to be the preferred SVHS professional entry level setup.
Maybe a real pro will jump in here and help.
Hope this helps a little.
-jts <amateur only>