#Video Machine vs Toaster
27-Apr-95 06:51:40
Sb: #5007-#Video Machine vs Toaster
Fm: Jeff Sauer 74441,652
To: henry teller 73244,2610
Henry:
Sorry, but that sounds like a Toaster bias to me. The $35,000 system
that Charlie White reviewed for DV was a rack-mountable, turnkey
system including computer, monitors, studio control box, 9GB storage,
jog shuttle, sound card, cables, and that illusive CG , in addtition
the board set. The board set for the VM with DP/R is about $13,000.
There's a YUV option, which I'm sure Charlie had, that adds another
$3000-4000. YUV is something you don't have with Flyer. Am I wrong
or does it still take a third party to even get Y/C? D2 is a
composite format. VM is also a includes a A/B roll, linear, machine
control capability that doesn't exist with Flyer.
I also have to agree with Charlie that the crouton editing interface
severly cripples serious editing work; poor audio control, no L-cuts,
no preview on small groups of edits, no trimming edits, etc.
As you know I used to work for Fast, so I guess I'm open to bias claims too. I
do not work for them now and still see VM as a superior product. I may be
wrong but I suspect the Flyer will sell well to Toaster owners. It's hard to
see much penetration into new markets, even with the PC version.
One other thing: I've kept myself from writing about this here for two weeks,
but now I'm on the subject of NewTek… I was quite discouraged by NewTek's
tact on Sunday before. I think they made some strategic mistakes that suggest
they're no longer focused on the big picture. I have been saying for years
that this industry is young and in a communal growth phase. Negativity isn't
healthy for a company nor the industry. I think NewTek showed they had some
internal work to do before they spend money on external issues. I welcome a
response from any one from NewTek.
Jeff Sauer