#UNITE TO FIGHT FCC!
This message turned up in search, but its forum couldn’t be identified from the original transcript, so it may not be linked into its thread.
Online Today OLT-201
ONLINE USERS UNITE TO FIGHT FCC PROPOSAL
(June 15)
It would seem that the online community is not too happy with a recent
proposal by the Federal Communications Commission.
As reported earlier in Online Today, the FCC has proposed that companies,
such as CompuServe, that offer online data transmission services through
local telephone loops should have to pay a special "access fee" to hook up to
the telephone network. The charges could run as high as $5 an hour per user,
which has the potential of boosting the telephone bills of CompuServe
subscribers by as much as hundreds of dollars per year.
Washington Post computer columnist Michael Schrage, who labels the idea
"half-baked" and nothing more than a "smidgeon of foolishness" blended with
"a dash of hypocrisy." Schrage says the proposal would only apply to the
commercial online services and not the private, corporate-operated systems.
Although other types of systems, such as voice communications companies
like MCI and Sprint, have to pay similar fees, Schrage maintains that
charging the commercial online services and not similarly charging the private
services is hypocritical of the FCC.
"If the FCC proposed a rule that would double the data communications costs
of the Fortune 500 companies with private networks, it would face so much
political heat that it'd break its legs backpeddling," writes Schrage, who
insists the proposal threatens the immediate future of online services and
the network nation.
The action, so far, is just a proposal, which means that the public is
invited to comment. John Hoffman of the Broadcast Professionals Forum (GO
BPFORUM) has said the forum, which specializes in radio and television
issues, is a natural place for subscribers to gather to learn more about the
situation and organize responses to the FCC. A detailed file, labeled
FCC732.NOT in Data Library 9, explains the proposal in more detail.
Hoffman told Online Today everyone who uses CompuServe should send in
formal comments to the FCC opposing the special access fee. For tips on the
most effective way of submitting comments, BP Forum has produced a special
file in Data Library 9 (filename is FILE.HLP).
For instance, Hoffman says the FCC is most interested in who you are, your
interests and a clear, but brief explanation of your opinion and related
facts. The facts should only be those that are essential to back up your
opinion. For the best results, your comments should be explicit, not
ambiguous. Comments should be sent to: Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554.
One FCC staff member, who asked not to be identified, told Online Today
that substantive, formal comments are the ones that will receive the most
attention. Postcards or simple votes expressing your opinion will not do much
good.
"It really helps if the individual can say how often he or she uses
CompuServe, for what purpose the service is used and the direct financial
effect it will have. If the comments are well written and submitted
formally, they could well be used in the FCC's final report on the matter,"
the staff member said.
Should the FCC receive several thousand comments on the proposal, it will
make an impact, and with 300,000 subscribers on CompuServe alone, the online
community can make its voice heard on this issue.
— Cathryn Conroy