Question on ARRAYs
15-Jun-90 20:16:35
Sb: #17323-Question on ARRAYs
Fm: Steven D. Kapplin 70055,1021
To: Art Steinmetz 76044,3204
Art,
In theory it will work, of course. But the programming to do it
becomes a bit horny. I guess I know now why most stat programs written in
Pascal or Modula generally use a disk virtual file, so it can page 32K into
and out of memory! I checked through my Lattice docs and it stated that
there was no limit on the size of an array in C other than that imposed by
memory, data, and storage type. However, I checked in some books on Modula
and apparently the 32K limit isn't uncommon to those language
implementations. I can't imagine why 'ol what's his name would have
created a language and imposed such an unnecessary limitation. I
understand the limitation on module size, but that certainly poses no
serious limitation on program implementation since it's highly unlikely
that one needs to write a single code module greater than 32K in even the
largest program. As I think of it, tho, I remember a number of Basic
implementations which had 32K limits on such things as max string length
and code size, but I think most of those were implementations with their
origins in CP/M. I guess that the practical solution is to page 32K of
data into memory at a time, then page it back out to disk. That is no more
complicated than the pointer solution and has the added feature of allowing
a datafile size limited only by disk storage. That way one could, in
theory, have a data file of extremely large size, while at the same time
not stepping over the 32K array boundary. Aha, an elegant solution with a
feature out of a "bug"!
Steve